KATO SD70ACE

SD75I Feb 13, 2009

  1. MRL

    MRL TrainBoard Member

    1,406
    14
    25
    The pre production pic looks wonderful!!!
    I hope the BNSF version gets produced. I think the BNSF are slightly different from the UP. Also a SD70M-2 would be nice... GEVO too while I am at it.
     
  2. Newman

    Newman TrainBoard Member

    152
    1
    12
    They are on the ship, on the way over as you read this. Word.
     
  3. bnsf971

    bnsf971 TrainBoard Member

    671
    15
    25
    I heard UP had to paint all those engines in fantasy paint schemes because the model railroad manufacturers wanted royalties...
     
  4. Newman

    Newman TrainBoard Member

    152
    1
    12
    Actually, the opposite it true, sorta. UP was charging royalties to manufacturers and they were squawking about it. In some instances, for paint schemes no longer used, such as the MKT. I had heard that some legal proceedings were on the horizon, but I am not sure, and all of a sudden, out come the heritage units. Funny thing about them, they don't relly resemble any of the original schemes, well, maybe in an abstract way, but to me, not really. In any case, soon after, UP stopped charging for the stuff...but, the damage is done, theres a lot of guys out there who will see Thomas the tank engine pulling their stuff before a UP engine will..... ;)
     
  5. N-Jineer

    N-Jineer TrainBoard Member

    537
    38
    25
    LMAO!

    I needed a good laugh after watching my beloved Manchester United lose 2-0 to Barcalona in the Champions League Final tonight:tb-sad:

    Just seen on the Kato Web Site that they're put DCC Instructions for the SD70Ace up today - shares the same lightboard as the 2006 SD40-2, so that means LED fitted DCC Decoders like the Digitrax DN163K1C.
     
  6. greatdrivermiles

    greatdrivermiles TrainBoard Member

    667
    422
    27
    looks like the pics of the UP units are up.
     
  7. jagged ben

    jagged ben TrainBoard Member

    1,832
    4
    31
    Another screwless design! Some will not be happy, although that doesn't include me...

    I'm a little surprised, I thought they would re-use the good old SD70MAC/AC4000CW mech.
     
  8. N-Jineer

    N-Jineer TrainBoard Member

    537
    38
    25
    I agree with you on both counts
     
  9. Mark Watson

    Mark Watson TrainBoard Member

    6,000
    1,319
    85
    One thing I'm noticing is they chose to leave out some minor areas of detail paint. On the Rio Grande, the whole front plow is left yellow. I'm sure this helped keep cost down quite a bit, but those of us who take the time to paint those air hoses and box behind the ditch lights black, make the side steps silver, and add a touch of red to the valve handles above the fuel tank will be left with one beautiful model.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Either way, we are presented with yet another superb looking model from Kato. [​IMG]
     
  10. virgule

    virgule TrainBoard Member

    225
    6
    11
    Excuse me. Locomotive rookie here... If I may ask, what it there to (potentially) dislike about a "screwless design" and just what _is_ a screwless design in the first place, please?

    thanks...
     
  11. sandro schaer

    sandro schaer TrainBoard Member

    2,020
    87
    43
    earlier split frame drives from kato were held together by using two screws. the newer design no longer features this screws. also the drive train looks completely different.

    there are some pros and cons of this design :
    cons :
    - trucks tend to fall out during transport
    - locos tend to lean to one side if trucks are not installed carefully

    pros :
    - no way to overtighten the screws and therefore bind the drive train.


    i have lots of kato engines of all levels of evolution. pre-dcc ready drives, dcc ready drives, the new screwless drives. i'm happy with all of them.
     
  12. Brian K

    Brian K TrainBoard Member

    754
    16
    28
    M.B. Kleins is showing the SD70Ace's in stock (at least the DRGW were in stock, but not now). Your favorite pusher should have them out shortly. Mr. Wallet just went into cardiac arrest.... :)

    Brian
     
  13. Traindork

    Traindork TrainBoard Member

    1,300
    395
    35
    I got all three of the ones that are supposed to be here any day on order. So what did I do today? Went to the hobby shop and bought more locomotives!
    Maybe I have a problem.....
     
  14. bnsf971

    bnsf971 TrainBoard Member

    671
    15
    25
    I know. My tongue was so far in my cheek, you could see it wagging out of my ear...
     
  15. Newman

    Newman TrainBoard Member

    152
    1
    12

    ;) ;) ;) ;)
     
  16. mavrick0

    mavrick0 TrainBoard Member

    504
    0
    22
    Kato had fixed the trucks falling out issue with the second run of BNSF with some foam to keep the trucks tight and then on the newest run of BNSF with the swoosh they had extended the white plastic piece under the fuel tank front and rear to support the trucks while being shipped. So these will probably have the same part to stop the trucks from popping out. I have yet to have an issue with this design.
     
  17. river_eagle

    river_eagle TrainBoard Member

    1,215
    23
    24
    we got them in at the shop today, but I didn't have a chance to even open one up, but tomorrow.......
     
  18. bnsf971

    bnsf971 TrainBoard Member

    671
    15
    25
    I wound up with one (#8520), and it's currently undergoing break-in, followed by some testing. It'll end up with DCC, I'm going to see if the sound decoder for the post-2006 SD40-2 will fit.
     

    Attached Files:

  19. river_eagle

    river_eagle TrainBoard Member

    1,215
    23
    24
  20. bnsf971

    bnsf971 TrainBoard Member

    671
    15
    25
    I guess sound isn't critical, it would've been nice.
     

Share This Page