TrainBoard Special Run Announcement

FriscoCharlie Oct 3, 2012

  1. Keith

    Keith TrainBoard Supporter

    4,596
    2,082
    88
    Tried a different computer.
    Got an error message again.
    BUT, I tried again, and the second time, purchase went through.
    And, second car purchase went through, no problems.
    Both show up on card account, so I guess that's good news!
    One car to run/weather and one to put on display!!
    Now, the waiting begins!!
     
  2. ATSF5078

    ATSF5078 TrainBoard Member

    477
    0
    11
    I can't wait to see someone weather the crap out of their car and see everyone cringe!
     
  3. wheelsqueal

    wheelsqueal TrainBoard Member

    73
    0
    9
    I've been hoping some of TrainBoard's n scale regulars will be researching who and where the Missouri-Illinois' bigger shippers were located on their system.
    I can conceive of believable return routing loads from Portland OR, Seattle/Tacoma, Winnipeg woo woo woo, Duluth MN, Minneapolis/St Paul to the St Louis area. But what Missouri-Illinois shippers sent carloads North and West?
     
  4. dstjohn

    dstjohn TrainBoard Member

    234
    8
    16
    Just ordered mine! Are they here yet????? :happy:I can't wait to add it to my fleet!!!
     
  5. bumthum

    bumthum TrainBoard Member

    304
    14
    16
    Since I model New Hampshire, I am going to use the car for outbound rolled newsprint and inbound canned goods/beer/etc. I dont have a papermill on my layout so outbound loads will simply be in the general manifest on through trains, inbound loads will be received at a freight house as less thaqn carload for local grocery stores/markets. This will probably lead to some custom painted box trucks...
     
  6. umtrr-author

    umtrr-author TrainBoard Member

    2,835
    3,394
    78
    The M-I apparently did a fair amount of coal business. The ORER for July 1963 showed 2199 cars on the roster, of which 347 were hoppers.

    Interestingly, and I didn't know this until I looked up this listing, another 992 of their cars were described as "Hopper, All Steel, with Steel Roof" ! They were given AAR Classification LO, which translates to "Covered Hopper." The M-I also had a few container cars which were equipped to handle dolomite or lime according to the listing. I wonder if those were what was carried in the "hoppers with steel roof"?
     
  7. Ottergoose

    Ottergoose TrainBoard Member

    178
    1
    13
  8. umtrr-author

    umtrr-author TrainBoard Member

    2,835
    3,394
    78
    True enough, thanks for the citation. The MP Color Guide has some similar photos. The 704100 is probably the most interesting to me as it has "drip rails" to try to protect the road number and ACI Label. According to the Color Guide cars with those "drip rails" were used in cement service.

    I'm not sure that any of these strike me as "hoppers with roofs" though.
     
  9. fordv10

    fordv10 TrainBoard Member

    44
    0
    16
    I ordered mine today. Cant wait for it to get here!
     
  10. Eagle2

    Eagle2 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    5,727
    479
    82
    Not that it really helps with this car, but the M-I was most heavily involved in coal from southern Illinois and lead from Missouri.
     
  11. railtwister

    railtwister TrainBoard Member

    196
    19
    19
    Re: The MI boxcar, if I missed it somewhere in previously, then I apologize, but this thread has grown too large and too quickly to keep up with. My question is, will the special run consist of the car in it's original scheme (from what era?), or in one of the more modern "patched out" versions as seen in so many pictures shown here, or has this even been decided yet?

    Bill in FtL
     
  12. maxairedale

    maxairedale TrainBoard Member

    1,739
    133
    34
    Hi All,

    I found some info here http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/t/154186.aspx on the Missouri-Illinois.

    There is a very long post about 1/2 way down the page that has some info on the type of the loads and the customers the railroad served.

    Gary
     
  13. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,297
    50,379
    253
    I believe it will come in the as painted new in 1962 scheme. If one wants to run it as it would have looked in the early 70 they may have to at least weather the heck out of it and maybe add some patches.
     
  14. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,671
    23,157
    653
    It has been noted here, wondering about our seeking additional information for this car. Yet bet we are! Every tidbit we can find, any little note posted in this topic. It's all adding up. So please keep it coming!
     
  15. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,297
    50,379
    253
    I just found these decals under a pile on my drafting table. I forgot I even had them. I bought them for the I-GN lettering but they also have the MISSOURI - ILLINOIS lettering. Would have saved me a lot of piecing together letters. [​IMG]
    img226.jpg
     
  16. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,671
    23,157
    653
    Yet another victim of Murphy's Laws...
     
  17. umtrr-author

    umtrr-author TrainBoard Member

    2,835
    3,394
    78
    I'd certainly vote for the as-delivered scheme, being that I model 1963! A renumbering would be needed for sometime later than that as part of the MP's general system renumbering. I have not come across a more specific date for that beyond "the 1960s" but it was definitely after the car was delivered. A roster as large as the MP's would take a few years to be completely renumbered so a very precise date for these specific cars might be difficult to come by.
     
  18. FriscoCharlie

    FriscoCharlie Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    11,140
    261
    135
    We need pictures.
     
  19. Calzephyr

    Calzephyr TrainBoard Supporter

    4,153
    1,149
    74
    Well... despite the probability that this will be a 1970's version as opposed to an early 1960's version... I ordered one last night.

    I've been a supporter of Trainboard for a long time and in addition to simply sending $$$... at least we will be getting a model of an actual rail car.
    I've paid as much for some rolling stock without any other benefit... this is a good way to help keep Trainboard going.
    I hope that there will be others that will set aside the differences with era, location and any other issues and look at this as a way to support this great model railroad resource.
     
  20. crclass

    crclass TrainBoard Member

    175
    7
    18
    Bravo, I couldn't agree more! Nice post.
     

Share This Page