Revisiting Gills Landing (Wisconsin)

W Neal Oct 12, 2012

  1. spiralcity

    spiralcity E-Mail Bounces

    10
    0
    5
    Every thing is looking great!
     
  2. paperkite

    paperkite TrainBoard Member

    935
    35
    12
    I think you got it just right !! the pilings ( steel pipe ) being on the inside or concrete coffer dams sunk down to the bed rock would not be out of place ? The high water mark is amazingly done , you just need to match it up to the trestle / bridge pilings . If it is a navigateable water way the Army Corps of Engineers would be involved and that could make it a bit tougher to model if you are trying for near prototype. ( as if the Corps gets it right everytime eh ? ) . Still WNeal , nice work indeed !!!
     
  3. dexterdog62

    dexterdog62 TrainBoard Member

    166
    1
    8
    N scale bird poop even more so...
     
  4. W Neal

    W Neal TrainBoard Member

    644
    283
    22
    Not really sure. I'd check that error message again. I put in a special filter. :cute:



    Actually, I think you found it. I've heard from some Aussies that are having the same problem. Sorry sir. I can email you some copies. PM me to remind me.
     
  5. W Neal

    W Neal TrainBoard Member

    644
    283
    22
    A valid point indeed.
     
  6. alexkmmll

    alexkmmll TrainBoard Member

    200
    0
    11
    I've gotta ask... It looks like there's quite a few trees in your prototype photos. How come you've left your model of it so bare? I would think it'd help cover up how close the backdrop is to the tracks.

    Alex
     
  7. W Neal

    W Neal TrainBoard Member

    644
    283
    22
    Like most scenes on my layout, it is not finished. I'll be doing more detail work on the bridge itself soon. When things are all "finished", I'll go back and add more trees. Less chances to break things that way.
     

Share This Page