When searching on line for information...

BoxcabE50 Dec 12, 2024

  1. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,694
    25,091
    653
    This is not directly about our hobby. But it is a caution for us all.

    A short time ago I was trading emails with a friend about dam construction back in the 1920s and 1930, on the Columbia River. Be very careful if you research anything these days via Google, etc. "AI" is quickly taking over.

    For example, the subject of dams had me wanting to refresh memory on some dates. So, Googling, I stumbled upon an AI answer that Bonneville Dam was the first on the Columbia River. This is absolutely false. Another AI list which I had asked for just the Columbia, added in a bunch from far, far off the main stream tributaries. (Useless fluff, as to my inquiry.) While yet another AI reply omitted at least one well known site altogether.

    I'm not looking to get into any debate about AI. Just wishing to be certain everyone knows it is still highly flawed concept and you must take care that what you find is indeed factual.
     
  2. Mike VE2TRV

    Mike VE2TRV TrainBoard Member

    5,775
    16,748
    103
    Flawed indeed. I don't even trust it as far as I can throw it. :cautious:

    It's great for very specialized applications (like medicine) where the database is limited to just the application's field - and not connected to the internet for anything other than updates.

    But for handling huge amounts of data, it's just like a human with information overload - it goes bonkers to varying degrees. :confused: They just don't have the critical thinking skills that help in sorting out fantasy from reality.

    I'll take NI (Natural Intelligence) over AI any day of the week.

    My little gray cells work just fine.;)
     
  3. Hardcoaler

    Hardcoaler TrainBoard Member

    11,831
    54,201
    152
    We can quickly spot omissions and BS on railroading because we know the topic well. Other users who don't know as much assume they are reading accurate information and use it, unwittingly spreading bad information for others to find and repost. Arrrgh.o

    This is why I like my books. It takes longer to find what I'm looking for, but I have more faith in what I find.
     
    Kurt Moose, KWE, gmorider and 4 others like this.
  4. cbg

    cbg TrainBoard Member

    422
    1,886
    36
    Very good points. I make it a habit when researching online to check at least three (sometimes 4 or 5) sources and if I get the same results I figure it is closer to fact than fiction. Not a guarantee, but does provide some cross check.
     
  5. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,347
    30,282
    253
    The AI in my car thinks this is the speed limit, in a school zone, BTW. Be wary, indeed.
    20240822_202903.jpg
     
  6. Mike VE2TRV

    Mike VE2TRV TrainBoard Member

    5,775
    16,748
    103
    Amen! Books can't be hacked, or AI'ed, or otherwise messed around with. Once they're printed, they're permanent. And I like the smell of old books.:)
     
  7. Hardcoaler

    Hardcoaler TrainBoard Member

    11,831
    54,201
    152
    Yessir! A few years back I read someone's post on a rail forum (not TrainBoard) where he expressed frustration over not being able to find pictures of what he needed on the Internet. I wasn't a member of the forum, so didn't respond, but a solution in books had somehow escaped his notice.
     
  8. Mark Ricci

    Mark Ricci TrainBoard Member

    837
    2,219
    34
    Definitely a great research - web surfing suggestion. The 3-5 sources was a rule in college when writing papers. 3 unrelated sources.
     
    Mike VE2TRV, Hardcoaler and BNSF FAN like this.

Share This Page