Product Review: Model Power FP7 Loco Disappoints

Author: gdm


The Model Power FP7 was a disappointment in many ways.

First off, given the acquisition of Model Power by MRC, N Scale modelers have had the highest hopes for a huge uptick in the quality of the Model Power product line to match what MRC has done with their own products in the recent decades. However, if there are improvements being made, you won't see any in this model. It is the same old mechanism that was developed by Model Power in 2006 with all its flaws.

I view the shell as the best feature of this model.
The shell is die-cast rather than injection molded plastic. This likely makes it more durable and it has a lot of heft. Personally I find the benefits of a metal shell to be partially offset by the difficulty of adding fine detail into the molding. The extra weight allows them to track well and the heft just feels good in your hand. It is also far more durable and less prone to small parts breaking off, scratches and dents.

The couplers are a big disappointment.
They are E-Z Mate horrors. These couplers are much larger than the competing MTL, Accumate and MTL-knockoffs we see elsewhere. They look awful. They also have an external spring that flies off (to be forever lost) when the model is handled. Mine came off when I removed the shell to inspect the internals. Furthermore, they are installed in pockets in such a way that they cannot be easily swapped for MTL couplers. Kato and Atlas at least have the decency to make coupler swap-outs easy. MRC apparently doesn't care if you don't like E-Z Hates.

An MRC rep at the January 2018 Springfield ARS show assured me that this was an all-new model that was value priced, but with all the bells and whistles expected by modelers. This was simply not true. Once I figured out how to remove the shell (fortunately not that hard), I saw that the mechanism was unchanged from the 2006 version. The only modification seemed to be the couplers - where the Rapidos were swapped for the E-Z Nightmares.

Fortunately, the mechanism is DCC Friendly. The box claims 'DCC-Compatible'. (Why do marketing folks insist on inventing a new term for something when there already exists a perfectly good one?) In any case, there are four leads coming from the trucks for power and two leads going to the motor and two more for the lights. This makes it an easy DCC-Friendly upgrade, but this model is NOT DCC-Ready. (50 Shades of DCC Ready by TroveStar Curator, Alain LM, explores the real meaning behind terms like ready, compatible, and friendly.) No drop-in decoder will work. End of story. In the modern world of NEM-651 plugs, there is simply no excuse for this. Not in a post 2010 release. Shame on you MRC.

This engine, which is really loud, might run perfectly well on a DC layout. That's very nice, but who cares? A Rapido rep told me that their release of GMD Diesels in DCC only configurations was a mistake because N Scale modelers want DC. Maybe. Maybe not. Of course if the item didn't sell, they know they made a mistake. But the world of N Scale is rapidly changing. The cadre of rivet-counting DC-only folks is dropping out of the hobby. I know lots of older modelers who simply stopped buying. They don't mind going on forum boards and ranting until they are blue in the face (fingers?) about how DC and rivets are important, but are they buying anything? Maybe they still were ten years ago when Rapido had trouble selling DCC-only engines, but are they still the buyers now?

The new wave of N Scale modelers is different. They typically have recently become empty-nesters and now that college costs are a thing of the past, they are returning to their childhood hobbies. They are the ones spending and what they are looking for is NOT this engine. They want DCC-Ready engines. They want couplers that play nicely with the rest of their fleet. They like detail (but not necessarily accuracy) and they surf the net for information on what to buy. Manufacturers take note: get your products up to snuff. The new generation of N Scale buyers is shopping.

 

I resemble this remark.

Let me add that I'm also willing to pay the extra 15-20 dollars to get one that has a basic dcc decoder already installed. I'm still in the planning stage of my layout and am debating wiring a loop that can be switched between dc and dcc just so I can run some of the older dc locos. I've done a couple dc to dcc conversions. Grinding frames to make room and making iffy solder connections is just not how I want to spend my time. Unless I get a REALLY good deal on something I have to have, my future engine purchases will have dcc already on board. I have one loco so far with sound and am still debating if that will be a future requirement for new acquisitions.

 

Model Power is on my list of banned manufacturers. I mean, just the cheap train set foobie scheme alone (US Army never had an FP7 nor did they ever use that livery, and their reporting marks are USAX not DOD) was a red flag. What also angered me the most was that their model originally came out in 2006 but looked more like 1976 quality. Call me a snob if you wish, but keep that "old fashioned" N scale junk away from me.

 

Agreed. I wince when I see Bachmann N Scale sets for sale in the big box stores and Hobbytown USA. Not only are they ridiculously overpriced, but the locomotives are often of early 1980's design and I am saddened knowing that our hobby will lose a potential member when they set it up and it sparks and stalls its way around the oval. There ought to be a law. The upsetting thing too is that with a bit more money, a much nicer set could be assembled and the owner would be happy. But the nicer stuff resides in better hobby shops and such shops are far fewer in number than the mass retailers.

Just my $0.02.