Playa Desnuda V3.0...

bremner Mar 21, 2024

  1. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,299
    6,426
    106
    so...V2.0 proved to be to small, AND I am sick and tired of Atlas switches, I am abut to start 3.0, I just got a pair of 4x8 sheets of foam, and I am about to buy Peco switches....
     
    BNSF FAN, JMaurer1, BoxcabE50 and 6 others like this.
  2. tonkphilip

    tonkphilip TrainBoard Member

    248
    316
    18
     
    BNSF FAN likes this.
  3. country joe

    country joe TrainBoard Member

    1,088
    3,001
    57
    In my experience Peco switches are way better than Atlas.
     
    BNSF FAN and tonkphilip like this.
  4. Stephane Savard

    Stephane Savard TrainBoard Member

    662
    1,882
    31
    I've got atlas switches all over my layout, and never again, I too don't like em as much as the two Pecos.
     
    BNSF FAN and tonkphilip like this.
  5. DeaconKC

    DeaconKC TrainBoard Member

    1,303
    4,392
    44
    I'm not trying to be a smart aleck, but since you are starting over from scratch, have you even considered Unitrack? It has been totally trouble free for me since rejoining the hobby.
     
  6. country joe

    country joe TrainBoard Member

    1,088
    3,001
    57
    When I lived in NY my club’s N scale layout used Peco track. It was very reliable. Our trains ran without any issues however on my home layout I use Unitrack. I prefer sectional to flex track and not having to ballast Unitrack is a huge plus for me.
     
  7. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,157
    653
    I've been using Peco since the late 1970's. In that time, I can only recall replacing one on a long ago layout.
     
  8. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,299
    6,426
    106
    not a chance, I am modeling a branch, unitrack roadbed is too well maintained
     
    BNSF FAN, DeaconKC, JMaurer1 and 3 others like this.
  9. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,299
    6,426
    106
    the Atlas switches made in China have been more miss than hit, and I have seen metal parts break, Peco works better
     
  10. BigJake

    BigJake TrainBoard Member

    3,311
    6,385
    70
    Well, that's the first time I've heard that critique! Very diplomatic, I might add.

    I think I'd find a way to half-bury it or something.

    But if it will be remotely controlled, Unitrack's electrical scheme for doing so is different than conventional Atlas- or tortoise-type machines, and might not integrate well with your existing switch controls.

    As they say, "Different horses for different courses."
     
  11. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,299
    6,426
    106
    just bought 20 Peco long switches....10 left and 10 right
     
  12. tonkphilip

    tonkphilip TrainBoard Member

    248
    316
    18
    Bremner, These 36 inch radius code 80 Peco switches, were recommended for the mainline in the NTrak manual back in the 80s and are a solid switch/turnout choice. - Tonkphilip
     
    country joe, BNSF FAN and bremner like this.
  13. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,299
    6,426
    106
    I decided on them because they are roughly the same size as an Atlas #6 and do not need a ground throw, getting the electrafrogs
     
  14. tonkphilip

    tonkphilip TrainBoard Member

    248
    316
    18
    Yes, they work well with their internal spring.
     
    BNSF FAN likes this.
  15. Shortround

    Shortround Permanently dispatched

    4,410
    5,283
    93
    I will stick with the Unitrack for my N scale DC.
    Back in the '70s the "club" used atlas. I was the electrician and only had one engine. The rest had collections of O gauge with passenger cars. I didn't like the Atlas tracks. Now I'm back to trying to switch over to HO DCC and still haven't decided what track to use. Kato doesn't have much in HO, so may go to Peco, at least for switches.
     
  16. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,299
    6,426
    106
    copy/pasta from my blog...

    Oh boy, where do I start? After operating Playa Desnuda V2.0, I quickly realized that I hated the design, it was too small and a 6 car train overwhelmed it. I also got frustrated with the lack of overall quality of Atlas switches, and some mediocre soldering by your’s truly.

    Life also got in the way, I have been putting off a much needed bathroom remodel until I got the funds, and right now, my new tub, greenboard and tile is sitting in the garage. Since I paid to have a delivery, I had them through in a pair of two inch thick 4×8’s of pink foam.

    My ex is a realtor and sold a home in town, the husband was an N Scaler and currently has dementia. I was given all of his structures, scenery, locomotives and cars. Unfortunately, most of the rolling stock is train set quality and too modern for me, I am only keeping about a dozen cars, some streetlights and the structures.

    Now here comes the “What the hell am I thinking?” moment…there is an Atlas Viaduct kit….I am thinking about incorporating it into the new layout, smoothing it out to be concrete.

    [​IMG]
     
    Hardcoaler, BoxcabE50, MK and 6 others like this.
  17. DeaconKC

    DeaconKC TrainBoard Member

    1,303
    4,392
    44
    Hey, if you like the viaduct, by all means use it! Best of luck on this project.
     
    BNSF FAN and tonkphilip like this.
  18. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,299
    6,426
    106
    Why a duck? Why not a chicken? I am always looking to do something different, but it is Southern California and a branch...
     
    BNSF FAN, DeaconKC and tonkphilip like this.
  19. DeaconKC

    DeaconKC TrainBoard Member

    1,303
    4,392
    44
    Alright! Another Marx Brothers fan!
     
  20. DeaconKC

    DeaconKC TrainBoard Member

    1,303
    4,392
    44
    Went back and looked at the viaduct again. It would be easy to integrate it as a highway overpass.
     
    tonkphilip, country joe and BNSF FAN like this.

Share This Page