More eBay Humor

OC Engineer JD Jan 16, 2009

  1. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,158
    653
  2. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,158
    653
  3. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,158
    653
  4. ScaleCraft

    ScaleCraft TrainBoard Member

    2,176
    99
    26
  5. RBrodzinsky

    RBrodzinsky November 18, 2022 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter In Memoriam

    5,685
    2,786
    98
    pastoolio likes this.
  6. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,158
    653
  7. SASRR

    SASRR TrainBoard Member

    126
    50
    12
    proably not aware it was added maybe?? just guessing.
     
  8. glennac

    glennac TrainBoard Member

    717
    159
    20
    Which means they would not be the original owner. How in heck could they say "New in Box" if they know nothing of the items history?

    And Blue Label? There's nothing "new" about it.
     
  9. RBrodzinsky

    RBrodzinsky November 18, 2022 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter In Memoriam

    5,685
    2,786
    98
    Yeah, I only looked to see what GP38s might be available, after spending my weekend fixing one that I have. I love that loco, and it isn't too difficult to convert to DCC.
     
  10. umtrr-author

    umtrr-author TrainBoard Member

    2,835
    3,394
    78
    pastoolio likes this.
  11. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,158
    653
    Marijuana must be legal where that seller lives.
     
  12. RGW1

    RGW1 TrainBoard Member

    484
    370
    20
  13. ScaleCraft

    ScaleCraft TrainBoard Member

    2,176
    99
    26
    carp. You gotta be kidding.
     
  14. RGW1

    RGW1 TrainBoard Member

    484
    370
    20
    I just looked again at this and can't see any mistake. maybe I am missing something. I just sent this question to the seller. Could they be looking at the build date of new 25 and think this is when the model was supposedly build and not understand it is the prototype data .
     
  15. RGW1

    RGW1 TrainBoard Member

    484
    370
    20
    got a answer back. They said the number is wrong, is suppose to be 6200 not 6209. I do not know if this is correct or not, but 7 bills as a start price ouch!! But what do I know maybe it will sell tomorrow.
     
  16. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,158
    653
    Uh, no. It is not an error. I wonder where their information originated?

    6209 was the first road number they ever released for this GN car. 6200 was the second number used. I had both of these years ago, before having Wick Brandon auction off my collection. The 6209 run may have sold out quickly, back forty years ago, as the 6200 was released only a few months later- Possibly a larger run. (George Irwin may know.) Years ago, 6209 was the one which commanded the highest price. As both collecting these and most of their prices have subsided, I wish the seller lots of luck getting that amount. There has been at least a third number of this car done since those days....
     
  17. FriscoCharlie

    FriscoCharlie Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    11,140
    261
    135
    At least he offers reasonable shipping.
     
  18. PatrickONB

    PatrickONB New Member

    4
    0
    10
    ROFL! :ROFLMAO:
     
  19. Hardcoaler

    Hardcoaler TrainBoard Member

    10,783
    45,627
    142
    BoxcabE50 likes this.
  20. umtrr-author

    umtrr-author TrainBoard Member

    2,835
    3,394
    78
    You're spot on with this as far as I know. I don't know that the 6209 was a "factory error". The third number was 6203. The 6209 remains elusive, however $1200 BIN as a price is rather "20 years ago."
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2015

Share This Page