Kato Passenger Set - whats the next one?

LehmanNWMS Mar 10, 2010

  1. wcfn100

    wcfn100 TrainBoard Member

    1,049
    63
    30

    E5s were stainless.

    Jason
     
  2. arbomambo

    arbomambo TrainBoard Member

    1,473
    713
    32
    Santa Fe built and retrofit most/all of their F units with stainless steel panels as well as their E units...
    Bruce
     
  3. Calzephyr

    Calzephyr TrainBoard Supporter

    4,153
    1,149
    74
    Even though it seems like the natural thing for Kato to do an E7 diesel... I just don't think they are committed to something that isn't on the point of a well known passenger consist. PERHAPS... they are considering doing a completely new Great Northern Empire Builder... but then what other named train could they use the E7 tooling for? Of course that arguement doesn't hold water when you question why a GS4 was made for the Morning Daylight.... or a GG1 for the Broadway Ltd... other than those models had not been done in N scale before... whereas the E7 has been done by a few other companies (even Kato/ConCor).

    The EMD "E" series of diesels will be done by a company with "industrial sized ball bearings" willing to take a chance to do ALL of them from the EA to the E9 and do them true to the prototype. I ventured a guess it would be Intermountain... and expected them to announce that new series after doing the last of the "F" series of diesels.

    So... anyway... when will Kato be formally announcing the Olympian Hiawatha with the EP-4 Little Joe's?? :pwink: :plaugh:
     
  4. Mike Skibbe

    Mike Skibbe TrainBoard Member

    401
    9
    24
    As mentioned, the E5's were stainless steel. Also, I think you're confusing two distinct methods for painting stainless steel finishes on models. The first is Alclad II Chrome paint which is applied over a gloss black base coat. The other method, authored by Marlin Cox and referenced by Mike Danneman in NSR over the years is a regular silver base coat with either Tamiya gunmetal diluted with clear, or Tamiya's clear smoke further diluted, and sprayed over the silver base coat to give the finish depth and shadow, better simulating stainless steel.
     
  5. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,322
    50,585
    253
    They would have to build a new chassis. Not that it would be that hard for Kato. The plastic clip that holds the front truck and electrical wipers would stick up and be visible, taking up most of the interior of the cab. On my E5, I modified a Life Like E3/E6 to create the model. On a whim, I bought a Broadway Limited E7 with decoder and sound to try and repower it. The cab on the shovel nose E's sits quite a way back from the position of the cab on the E7-E9. However, a really neat feature of the Broadway Limited chassis is that the cab interior can be easily moved back and plugged into a ready made location to sit under the Life Like shovel nose shell.

    I test fit a Life Like shell onto a Kato chassis. It could be made to fit but like I said, you would have to live with no cab interior. Here the shell is still riding a little high and already the cab is about full.
    [​IMG]
     
  6. heintz

    heintz New Member

    6
    0
    8
    That brings up a point I am POed about, which is, I prefer the streamliners of the 30s and early 40s. Kato has completely ignored these (Thank you FVM!) I would love to see a UP 10002.10004,10006...

     
  7. ChicagoNW

    ChicagoNW E-Mail Bounces

    499
    13
    11
    I believe that the 30s and early 40s are the decades that ConCor has assigned to them.
     
  8. heintz

    heintz New Member

    6
    0
    8
    Unfortunately, Con Cor does NOT do anything longer than a 3 car train anymore.
     
  9. Delamaize

    Delamaize TrainBoard Member

    627
    2
    25
    the problem with the streamliners like UP 10002, 10004, 10006 is they are very specific, and the cars and power can't really be used for anything else, where the NCL and Oly Hia cars could all be painted in several diffrent schemes and railroads.
     
  10. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,084
    27,871
    253
  11. Calzephyr

    Calzephyr TrainBoard Supporter

    4,153
    1,149
    74
    I think that the argument FOR making an NCL is better than ANY of the other classic passenger consists... but... logical doesn't seem to fit the whims of Kato. That's not to say any of their previous releases were illogical... but... the requests for an accurate NCL has been out there for at least the 10 yrs I've been on these model railroading boards.

    Just the same... there are several good options still left that would have the "WOW" factor. Maybe the unexpected is what we should expect from Kato. That's one of the reasons I'm saying that the next release is going to the the Olympian Hiawatha... it's a consist that is very Milwaukee Road specific... and not something we would expect from a manufacturer. Furthermore... an EP-4 Little Joe would likewise be a stunning 'curveball'... in light that they already did a GG1 and its following has been somewhat lukewarm despite many requests in the past 10 yrs. My only other call on the motive power for the Oly Hia would be a Hudson class F-7 (Otto Kuhler???) steamer.

    I really can't think of any other 'western' road that is left to do with that "WOW" factor consist and motive power.

    If Kato really wants to surprise us... it would be a Twentieth Century Ltd with a Dreyfuss Hudson.... but... I don't think this is the one they're going for this time around.

    Any of the above choices would interest me... I'd just like to know as soon as possible so I can start saving my lunch money. ;)

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 20, 2012
  12. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,322
    50,585
    253
    I believe my Sunset Limited is safe for now.
    [​IMG]

    Although, my Sam Houston Zephyr is in danger of being copied. :pbiggrin:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Randy Stahl

    Randy Stahl TrainBoard Supporter

    1,518
    2,062
    50
    The F7 hudsons didn't haul the Olympian Hiawatha-certainly not west of Minneapolis, the Olympian was the domain of the FM Erie builts, Quill electrics, Little Joes, Bi Polars, 4-8-4s, FP-7s E-7s the E-6 set, E-9s

    Randy
     
  14. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,689
    23,238
    653
    The Oly Hi was launched in June of 1947. Out west was "The Gap" and any steam there would have been two F6 4-6-4 engines converted to oil, or an "S" class 4-8-4. Otherwise, it was Diesels, Bipolars, Joes, the two converted Boxcab sets.... East of Harlowton could have also seen an "S" class used. If an F7 4-6-4 went west of the Twin Cities, it would have likely been a little bit unusual. I won't say never...

    Quills were usually found on #17 and #18, The Columbian. If they pulled the Hi, I'd believe by 1947 such would have been as substitute power, rather than a regular assignment.
     
  15. Calzephyr

    Calzephyr TrainBoard Supporter

    4,153
    1,149
    74
    BoxcabE50... Since you're online... I was wondering about the different 'classes' of Milwaukee Road passenger steam. I saw a picture of a Pacific class (4-6-2) which looked a lot like the Hudsons. I think it was called 'Chippewa'... and had road number 152. Where did Milw Rd use these Pacific class steamers?
     
  16. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,689
    23,238
    653
    As I recall, there were three such 4-6-2 locos. #150 Class F3 and #151, 152 as Class F1.

    I can't say for certain where all they might have been used. The Chippewa ran as Train #21 between Chicago and Ontonagon, Michigan- Then as Train #14 return trip. I'd guess use was similar type runs in the Wisconsin-Illinois region.
     
  17. bluebird

    bluebird TrainBoard Member

    10
    1
    20
    Mr Straw, is that Sunset obs a ConCor 10-6 with a Rowa PS Obs rear grafted on? Please tell as it looks fantastic!

    Gerry
     
  18. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,322
    50,585
    253
    Busted. Wow, you have sharp eyes. It does not quite line up but it was all I could find. I also added Kato trucks to the Con Cor car so as to pick up power to light the lights.
     
  19. bluebird

    bluebird TrainBoard Member

    10
    1
    20
    Thanks Russell, what a clever way to create this ubique blind end obs. I've often thought it would work but my painting skills are rubbish. I have a few of the old Rowa cars and would love to use a dome to sub (with smoothed sides) for a Wabash dome.....

    By the way for 'busting' you I'll take a stainless E5 please! ;O)))

    Gerry
     
  20. NorsemanJack

    NorsemanJack TrainBoard Member

    2,262
    968
    51
    Okay, so it sounds like it will be the Olympian Hiawatha. Not my first choice..... (actually, not in my top four; NCL, Denver Zephyr w/E5, Empire Builder, 20th Century), but I would still buy it. The good news is that Kato still sees a viable market for accurate, reasonably priced, high quality complete "name trains." Let's hope that when the economy picks up, and before us boomers disappear, that they'll finally get around to the others I mentioned.
     

Share This Page