"heavyweight" Geep

bambuko Dec 4, 2006

  1. bambuko

    bambuko TrainBoard Member

    229
    0
    15
    while installing the decoder, I took the opportunity to add some weight to my GP35. Here is a "before and after" photo:
    [​IMG]

    the weight has increased from typical (for GP35) 36gm to 61,5gm
    this makes it heavier than my F7 (at 61gm)

    you can see the smallest decoder available (DCX74zD) and SMD LEDs

    body mounted couplers are still to come
    Chris
    now I need to convince MTL that the whole chassis should be made out of sintered tungsten alloy :zip:
     
  2. tsa

    tsa TrainBoard Member

    31
    0
    12
    Chris, this is really good to know. I have been thinking of adding weight to my GP35 too, but was too chicken to try.
    The material you are using is brass, right?
    Do you have the dimension of the front pieces?

    Thanks
     
  3. Chris333

    Chris333 TrainBoard Supporter

    2,541
    253
    49
    He used Tungsten, very heavy and very hard to cut.
     
  4. rray

    rray Staff Member

    8,312
    9,470
    133
    Excellent work Chris! Does it all fit inside the shell now, or do you still need to do a bit more fitting?

    I wonder how many cars you can pull? We pulled 47 cars with the gold sample GP35, so I bet you can pull 30-40 cars up a 2% grade with that baby! [​IMG]
     
  5. tsa

    tsa TrainBoard Member

    31
    0
    12
    You sure he use tungsten? --- from the photo it looks like brass to me.
     
  6. Chris333

    Chris333 TrainBoard Supporter

    2,541
    253
    49
  7. tsa

    tsa TrainBoard Member

    31
    0
    12
  8. bambuko

    bambuko TrainBoard Member

    229
    0
    15
    sorry for the silence - I was away on business
    Everything fits fine - no problem. I will take more photos tommorow
    should be easy - I got my extended test oval set up so that I can try different grades. The only limit will be when the end of the train gets close to it's beginning on this test track :shade: something about chasing it's own tail ...
    Will report test results as soon as available
    Chris
     
  9. Joe D'Amato

    Joe D'Amato TrainBoard Member

    1,749
    352
    38
    Actually the powers that be are talking about Enlisting me into the Marines so I can send back Depleated Uranium from Iraq for the new chassis. I'm not sure I like this idea much. Great job with the weights, I'll try them out on my DCC CORPS 35's over Christmas break.

    Joe
    MTL
     
  10. RSmidt

    RSmidt TrainBoard Member

    899
    0
    19
    Joe, I take it there is no major concern about overtaxing the motor with the extra weight?

    Randy
     
  11. bambuko

    bambuko TrainBoard Member

    229
    0
    15
    Hey Joe, this is a high praise - coming from you - thank you :thumbs_up:
    I got some ideas already how to do it better, so the next one will be slightly different, and ultimately my dream is to have entire chassis out of this stuff. Technically no big deal, the only question is volumes...
    Chris
     
  12. Chris333

    Chris333 TrainBoard Supporter

    2,541
    253
    49
    Chris,

    Just how hard is this stuff to machine? Does it require special cutting tools?

    I have discussed tungsten many times with N scalers and was always told to was just about impossible to machine or even cut.

    Thanks
     
  13. rray

    rray Staff Member

    8,312
    9,470
    133
    I was told they make this stuff in a putty form for adding weight to golf clubs? I don't golf so I can't verify this?
     
  14. Chris333

    Chris333 TrainBoard Supporter

    2,541
    253
    49
  15. bambuko

    bambuko TrainBoard Member

    229
    0
    15
    you can use normal metal working tools (files, saws etc) - it is easy. I have used carbide tooling on my mill because I have it, otherwise it would be OK with HSS. The only things you have to be careful with is drilling and tapping (especially in small sizes)
    Chris
     
  16. bambuko

    bambuko TrainBoard Member

    229
    0
    15
    the quoted density of putty is 7gm/cubic cm
    which is dissapointing indeed when compared to the alloy I have used (at around 18gm/cubic cm)

    Chris
     
  17. Chris333

    Chris333 TrainBoard Supporter

    2,541
    253
    49
    Thanks this gives me hope with my limited tools.
     
  18. bambuko

    bambuko TrainBoard Member

    229
    0
    15
    everything I have done on my Geep could have been done with just basic metal working hand tools - it would just look a bit rougher, but who cares - it is hidden anyway
    Chris
     
  19. kimvellore

    kimvellore TrainBoard Member

    643
    29
    26
    The golf use tungsten powder contains non binding agent so the tungsten can flow easily which reduces the volume density.
    One more option is:
    http://www.tungsten-heavy-powder.com/index.html

    Close to lead and can be made into moulds. Maybe this can be used to mould the GP chassis and add solid tungsten on top of it.

    Where do you folks get solid tungsten bars, the ones I have seen are rods.

    Kim
     
  20. bambuko

    bambuko TrainBoard Member

    229
    0
    15
    Kim, great web page !!!!
    you are right - the max density you can get out of this stuff is 10gm/cubic cm, which roughly equates to lead, but is still behind the alloys I have used at around 17gm/cubic cm
    The stuff you are suggesting could be used for home/diy

    I have managed to get sample quantities through my private contacts and considering the results it gives I will certainly try to get more :teeth:

    and btw, the web site you have found says:
    "...We will design and manufacture a sintered, solid tungsten heavy metal component per your specifications. Unique solutions of up to 18.5 g/cc..."

    perhaps we need to send Joe there to obtain quotes for the future MTL products :zip:

    Chris
     

Share This Page