8500 turbines

Run8HighBall Mar 13, 2005

  1. Run8HighBall

    Run8HighBall E-Mail Bounces

    1
    0
    12
    Wouldnt it be nice to see one of these beasts run a freight across the wasatch again. Just once a year would be great.
     
  2. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    461
    127
    Welcome to Trainboard, Run8 [​IMG]

    Definitely that would be a big railfan event! I would love to see and hear one - must sound a bit like a jet engine, I guess.
     
  3. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,986
    7,002
    183
    Their horrendous noise was why they were barred from operating anywhere near Los Angeles, San Francisco, or similar metropolitan areas. I believe they were only used in desolate unpopulated districts such as those in Wyoming and Utah.
     
  4. Chad Thomas

    Chad Thomas TrainBoard Member

    17
    0
    13
    I've never seen one run. I sure wish I could.
     
  5. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    461
    127
    Welcome aboard Chad [​IMG]

    Are any of these machines preserved? (Not that I expect any to run again) :(
     
  6. John Barnhill

    John Barnhill TrainBoard Member

    3,277
    110
    49
    Here's pics of two preserved UP Turbines:

    #18 at Union,IL (Brad Logan)
    [​IMG]

    #26 at Ogden,UT (Jeff Black)
    [​IMG]
     
  7. Chad Thomas

    Chad Thomas TrainBoard Member

    17
    0
    13
    Thanks for the welcome allan.

    Nice pix john, I also have pix of 26 at Ogden.

    Shure wish I could have seen one running.
     
  8. John Barnhill

    John Barnhill TrainBoard Member

    3,277
    110
    49
    Most definately!!! Heard a story once where UP parked one under a small rural bridge. Got so hot it melted the pavement on the bridge.
     
  9. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,986
    7,002
    183
    Both GE and UP nicknamed these babies "Big Blow."
     
  10. choops

    choops TrainBoard Member

    20
    0
    13
    Have seen the engine at Union Il. Unfortunatley th turbine engine is gone.
    The exhaust opening on the back is huge.
    I climbed the tender to take a look.
    They do a nice job of keeping the engine painted and it is displayed very proudly.
    I need to get out there this summer with my new digi cam.
    Steve
     
  11. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    461
    127
    Are the two units above just displayed in the open near the stations, or as part of a collection?
     
  12. Chad Thomas

    Chad Thomas TrainBoard Member

    17
    0
    13
    John,
    I also heard the story. Seems the hogger parked the big blow exhaust stack under a overpass. It blew a hole the size of the stack right through the whole overpass. I wonder if it took a car to find the hole.
     
  13. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,986
    7,002
    183
    Alan, I believe the upper photo was taken at the Illinois Train Museum, which has an obscenely large collection of hardware, many of which are operational. Although, sadly, not X-18... :(
     
  14. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,689
    23,238
    653
    What was the downfall of these monsters? Fuel consumption? Maintenance? Or both? Is the other one intact? Or is the turbine also missing there?

    :D

    Boxcab E50
     
  15. choops

    choops TrainBoard Member

    20
    0
    13
    I believe the fuel used (buncer c) was a byproduct of manufacturing diesel fuel and was very cheap.
    Then it was used for making plastics and was not cheap anymore.

    Steve
     
  16. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    461
    127
    Steve, I think that was the reason I had heard, and as these machines were real fuel guzzlers, that was their downfall. :(
     
  17. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,085
    27,872
    253
    Their fuel consumption was amost as bad at idle as at full throttle. The heavy fuel oil they used had to be heated in the tender to keep it flowing. Must have been some nasty stuff...
     
  18. beast5420

    beast5420 TrainBoard Member

    761
    40
    28
    isn't bunker c what the sp cab forwards ran on?

    beast
     
  19. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    Bunker C is also what the NAvy ran on until like the 50s or 60s right?

    I have a recollection of reading about the Iowa class battleships when they were rebuilt in the early 80s they were converted from Bunker C to Navy Distillate.
     
  20. John Nutt

    John Nutt E-Mail Bounces

    91
    0
    19
    Fellas,
    I lived in Laramie when these monsters were running over Sherman Hill. Back in those days the rumor was that the UP could not find a train heavy enough that could not be handled by a Big Blow but on the down side, if the turbine malfunctioned while out on the road, you had a big problem with no other units in the consist. With multiple diesels you can isolate a no-loading loco and try to limp on down the line. J Nutt
     

Share This Page