Would this be strange on a layout?

css29 Jan 4, 2010

  1. css29

    css29 TrainBoard Member

    253
    1
    13
    I was wondering if it would be wrong to have Southern Pacific, Union Pacific and BNSF all running on the same layout?
     
  2. RBrodzinsky

    RBrodzinsky November 18, 2022 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter In Memoriam

    5,685
    2,786
    98
    You just have some "heritage" equipment running, with the SP :)
     
  3. css29

    css29 TrainBoard Member

    253
    1
    13
    Are there any other railways that I could run and not be that far off?
     
  4. SteamDonkey74

    SteamDonkey74 TrainBoard Supporter

    7,160
    171
    90
    Portland, Oregon, in the 70s and 80s, was served by Southern Pacific, Union Pacific, and Burlington Northern, so it doesn't seem all that strange to me. UP borged SP in September 1996, but not everything was repainted right way (even 13 years later I still see the odd SP livery unit). The BNSF merger was December 1996, if I recall correctly. Seeing UP, SP, and BNSF all around the same area has been a possibility here since 1996.
     
  5. retsignalmtr

    retsignalmtr TrainBoard Member

    898
    4
    19
    No it would not be strange. I saw that here on the east coast with Conrail trains having BNSF, SP, CSX, CP, CN, NS and other roads including leased units mixed in. I haven't seen it too much since CSX took over but it gives me chances to mix up units on my layout and add some more color to my trains.
     
  6. Stourbridge Lion

    Stourbridge Lion TrainBoard Supporter

    16,680
    131
    184
    It depends

    I am assuming you are asking from a real life basis; so, my question back to you is for what Era and location is your layout based?

    To me, whatever makes you happy is what is right...

    :tb-wink: :tb-wink: :tb-wink: :tb-wink:​
     
  7. css29

    css29 TrainBoard Member

    253
    1
    13
    Great! Now I can start building my fleet.
     
  8. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,672
    23,157
    653
    No. Not at all. The BNSF merger, and the UP/SP merger happened in the same year, 1996. SP power was not all renumbered immediately, it took years.

    Aside from the above, remember this- It's your railroad. You got 'em? You want to run 'em? Then do it, and have fun!

    Boxcab E50
     
  9. Rossford Yard

    Rossford Yard TrainBoard Member

    1,209
    142
    34
    Not at all, and less and less so in the modern era where there are loads of trackage rights. For those three roads, I once had a Cajon Pass layout. Tehachapi Loop also features both roads (SP now a fallen flag) The line south of Denver was SF or BN, SP and DRGW (now BNSF and UP)

    I am sure you could find other examples of shared trackage and trackage rights agreements between almost any two roads out there, and maybe three. Of course, that is if you feel the need to justify running anything. Many don't, they just run what they like. Even in a "non normal" situation, there are occaisional derailment and/or track work detours or other special or experimental trains, like the NS Road Railer being tried on a few different routes.

    So, no worries.
     
  10. Westfalen

    Westfalen TrainBoard Member

    4,094
    33
    55
    The Joint Line from Denver to Pueblo is another example, was originally ATSF/CB&Q with D&RGW trackage rights, over the years those roads evolved into BNSF/UP. If you model the era just after the UP/SP merger when SP power had yet to be repainted you are all set.
     
  11. D-Rio

    D-Rio TrainBoard Member

    76
    1
    16
    I live right betwen those two cities.

    We see obviuosly a lot of BNSF followed by UP. We still have some SP locos hanging around from time to time and even see some D&rgw stuff. The SP and DRGW stuff pretty much has all been renumbered with yellow plates though.

    Heck friday i saw two NS locos for the first time in front of a UP coal train. Dont know what they were doing way out west.
     
  12. Trains

    Trains TrainBoard Member

    486
    521
    28
    I worked for UP for 35 years, and I seen just about everything in the yards.
     
  13. MRLdave

    MRLdave TrainBoard Member

    1,282
    1,260
    41
    You might not see them in equal numbers, but You can see virtually anything anywhere anymore. On my way to Billings this weekend I passed a BNSF grain train headed east with a KCS engine in the lead, and a coal train with a CSX engine in the mix. And they were all running on MRL track. I've seen NS, CP and UP engines mixed in the BNSF trains.......I even saw a NdeM engine go thru once on a BNSF train.
     
  14. jagged ben

    jagged ben TrainBoard Member

    1,832
    4
    31
    Not only would it not be strange to have SP, UP and BNSF on the same layout, but you could also add Santa Fe and Burlington Northern to the same layout and have it be no less strange. Such a mix of equipment would be very realistic especially for the period between 1996 and the year 2000, in any of a number of locations out west. These are exactly the roads that I model on our club layout, which includes Tehachapi Pass and Donner pass.
     
  15. Jeepy84

    Jeepy84 TrainBoard Member

    1,051
    129
    25
    I got a glimpse of an NS coal train eastbound while I was going over the line on the Route 66 bypass the other day. There was a black NS in the lead and whatever was behind it was bright yellow, looked UP to me. Then there was another black NS behind it. Of course I saw this from about 150+ feet up and about half a mile away at 55-60 mph, but theres few bright yellow roads running large engines around. I of course tried squinting to see better but by that time we were across the bridge, lol.
     

Share This Page