SP Hy-Cube 40' boxcar

Tunnel Motor Mar 2, 2007

  1. Tunnel Motor

    Tunnel Motor TrainBoard Member

    90
    0
    18
    Hi,

    can anyone tell me until when we could see the Hy-Cube 40' boxcar rebuilt in 1965.

    The sub-serie counts 659008 to 659047.


    Here is a pic of the March 2007 released SP boxcars by MT in N scale. I need to know if I can operate it prototypically in my era : 1990-1997

    [​IMG]

    Thanks
    TM
     
  2. SSW9389

    SSW9389 TrainBoard Member

    414
    4
    21
    My 7/79 ORER showed 26 on the roster for that date. Now you need someone with a newer ORER to reply.
     
  3. SP 9811

    SP 9811 TrainBoard Member

    1,357
    2,595
    58
    As of 1-1994, they are not on SP's equipment roster. I never did see them during the time period mentioned.
    Thom
     
  4. Joe D'Amato

    Joe D'Amato TrainBoard Member

    1,749
    352
    38
    Time

    I'll check the newer ORERs and see what dates they ran...also Creative Services should have historical info on this car I can post.


    Cheers

    Joe
    MTL


     
  5. SP 8299

    SP 8299 TrainBoard Member

    759
    0
    28
  6. Joe D'Amato

    Joe D'Amato TrainBoard Member

    1,749
    352
    38
    Run

    Did a bit of digging and they were still active in 1985 but did not appear in our 1992 ORER. I think it's close enough for you to use.

    Cheers

    Joe
    MTL

     
  7. Tunnel Motor

    Tunnel Motor TrainBoard Member

    90
    0
    18
    Thank you guys for your effort in digging datas (I spent almose one hour on google to find some infos but I didn't manage to get any pics or data) :

    It helps me : I will then save some bucks for other purchases...

    TM
     
  8. sp4009

    sp4009 TrainBoard Member

    803
    157
    22
    The MT car is close enough that very few people would notice, especially in N scale. The Espee cars were rebuilt from older 40' boxcars for apliance service. There are quite a few differences, the most obvious would be the roof. The Espee cars had a diagonal panel roof vs. MT's Pullman Standard bow tie roof. Also the Espee cars had riveted 5 panel sides vs. welded 6 panel sides. The seams from Espee raising the roofs on these cars is also quite noticeable. Other differences include the ends and side sills, etc.... The Espee was never a big fan of Pullman Standard, which most of MT's products are based on.

    All differences aside:teeth:

    MT did a great job with the car itself. I've got a UP one:embarassed:
     
  9. John Barnhill

    John Barnhill TrainBoard Member

    3,277
    110
    49
    I'll definately need one of these to go with my two Bachman 40ft HyCubes in Cotton Belt. :D :D
     
  10. Flash Blackman

    Flash Blackman TrainBoard Member

    13,326
    503
    149
    Yes, Cotton Belt had these, too. They were 36000 to 36126 series. The first four (or so) were built in the shops and had different type side panels where a normal boxcar was modified. I think they were all cushion frames. Here are modified Bachmann cars, N scale. They are correct with the ribs, but the early cars were smooth side, I believe.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. SirTainly

    SirTainly TrainBoard Member

    322
    10
    22
    Too bad there was a problem with the paint on this MT car and thus a lot of dealers didn't get any. :(
     
  12. SD40T-2

    SD40T-2 TrainBoard Member

    51
    0
    12
    I often go back and forth many years on I-10 between Lordsburg, NM to Yuma, AZ. Used to see them cut into mixed freights during that time period, usually weathered and beat to hell. Cheers.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 24, 2007

Share This Page