NW Questions for LEW

fitz Jun 18, 2002

  1. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    I know this question belongs on a Nickel Plate forum, but we don't have one. Reading Kevin Holland's book on Nickel Plate Berkshires, there is a chapter on Wheeling and Lake Erie Berks, and it says they did not have a feedwater heater. Can't find a feedwater pump on one anywhere in any pictures. I do see two "inverted funnels," both on the fireman's side, one ahead and one behind the trailing truck. Those funnels were usually part of injectors. I assume (should never do that) that they had two injectors. Do you know? I feel comfortable putting the question here since the NYC and NKP were in sight of each other on a lot of right of way.
    Second question--The NYC Niagaras had such clean lines. Someone told me that the air tanks were somewhere in the engine frame. Where were the air horn and whistle mounted? They are not visible in any photos I have seen. Thanks. [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Well, this is embarrassing. Asked the airhorn question on another site and a guy referred me to my own site, photo of 6017 which clearly shows the horn just forward of the cab, engineer's side, right by the handrail. I have other shots where no horn is visible. Was it an add-on? [​IMG]
     
  3. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    the WLE Berks had Elesco exhaust
    steam injectors.Remember the article
    on feedwater heaters,that exhaust
    steam injectors were the same as a
    feedwater heater.The two funnels, I
    think the front one is from the
    engineers side on his injector and
    the one at the rear is for the firemans injector.
    Yes the Main Reservoirs were between
    the side fames.Other 4-8-4s also
    had this feature,UP,ACL,MILW,and the
    D&H.
    The air horn was probably like the
    sand traps.they were hidden some where in front and were hard to
    maintain.They were moved to the
    boiler position for ease of mainte-
    nance.Also snow could have been
    another reason,it gets in the horn
    and plugs it up. LEW
     
  4. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    LEW, thanks again! You are a regular encyclopedia of information. I have to think of some more puzzling questions (for me) to ask of you. [​IMG]
     
  5. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Lew, I have thought of another. Can you tell us the difference between Duplex and BK stokers? I think I know part of the answer, the Duplex was the one with two feeds coming up either side of the firebox door, correct? Thanks. :confused: [​IMG]
     
  6. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    We will start wih the Duplex.The
    Duplex had two elevator barrels coming through the cab floor at an
    angle on each side of the firebox
    door against the backhead of the
    boiler.They were fed by a conveyer
    screw from the tender to the elevators.At the upper end of the
    barrels about 1/3 of the way
    from the top were openings from the
    barrels to the fire box.At these
    openings were distributing plates.
    Above and behind these plates were
    steam jets that blowed the coal into
    the fire box.The fireman adjusted
    the jet pressure by valves in the
    steam line to the jets.Yo adjusted
    the pressure by starting the stoker
    with about 15lbs.of jet pressure and
    observe where the coal was going in
    the fire box.After the fireman was
    satisfied he would note the pressure
    on both jets and close the main valve to the jets.The pressure gauge
    for the jets was a duplex gauge and
    recorded both pressures on one gauge
    These barrels operated on a ratchet
    and paw system some what like a reel
    type push lawn mower.They would make a half turn ratchet back and make
    another half turn.If you wanted to
    reverse one of the barrels if some-
    thing lodged in the elevator you
    lifted the top up as far as it would
    go and the ratchet and paw was
    reversed and the elevator reversed
    direction.If you did not want the
    elevator to turn you lifted the top
    up halfway and it would not turn.We
    would use the 3/4 in.hose used to
    clean the cab and water the coal to
    keep the dust down under the stoker
    top when we did not want that barrel
    to operate. There was another steam
    gauge next to the jet gauge that
    recorded the pressure to the stoker
    engine.These stokers fired lite in
    the rear(that's the end where the fire box door is located)so the fire
    man usually built a small heel or
    ridge of coal along the rear of the
    fire box.This type of stoker was not
    the best but they got the job done.
    When I started some H-10s and all of
    the H-6 locomotives had the Duplex
    stokers.
    The BK stokers were screw fed from
    tender to the fire box.About two ft.
    from the fire box the conveyer came
    through the cab floor angling up to the fire box door opening The fire box doors(butterfly)closed on top of the stoker where it entered the
    fire box. On these stokers was a dis
    tributing plate about two ft. wide
    extending into the fire box about 10 in. just
    below where the coal was discharged
    from the stoker into the fire box.
    The dist. plate had two curved ribs
    on each rear corner to direct the
    coal to the corners.Just above the
    dist. plate was was 11 jets.Two
    for each rear corner and the rest
    covering the sides,front and center
    of the fire box.One row of jets across was for fine coal and the
    others for heavier bigger coal.As the coal came through the screw it
    came out in lumps around 1 1/2 -2ins. in size.
    At the fireman's position were five
    jet valves and a main valve arranged
    like an arrow pointed down.Across
    the top,l-r, left rear,main and right rear. Next l-r, l side,lfront
    and center,r side,rfront and center.
    At the point was the fine coal.This
    covered the entire fire box.To start
    you closed all of the jets except the fine coal.Then you started the
    stoker and adjusted the fine coal
    to not quite reach the front of the
    fire box.Then both side and front jets,also not quite reaching the front.Then both rear jets.You would
    have to fine tune the jets when the
    engineer started working the engine
    pulling the train.This was a much
    better stoker because you had more control over the placement of the coal.You could roll a heel in the
    back by simply closing the jets and
    running the stoker until you had the size heel you wanted.Standard also
    made a model HT stoker that was a
    later model that I think was a much
    better stoker.You could do anything
    with the HT that you could do with
    a shovel as concerning placement of
    coal LEW
     
  7. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    LEW, wow! and thanks again. That is the most technical and operational information I have ever seen, anywhere, on stokers. I have seen old photos of NYC cabs with the duplex which seemed pretty obvious from the two "barrels." I assume the only way you could "tune" each jet was to keep the fire doors open to watch? :confused: [​IMG]
     
  8. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    The initial jet setting was done on the ready track. It did not take
    any real time and was a starting
    point.Sometimes you hit it right
    the first time.The harder the engine
    was worked usually pulled the coal forward and this was what you looking for when you fine tuned.the coal might be covering just right or
    you might have to reduce the total jet pressure a little.If you wanted to get a good look at the fire you
    opened the fire door and held it
    open with the pedal and if you wanted to look at the left side you
    placed the blade of the shovel
    vertical on the right side of the door causing draft to pull the fire away
    from the left side of the fire box.
    This gave you a perfect view of the condition of the fire on that side and
    by placing the shovel on the other side you had a quick view of the entire fire box.
    On the Duplex the fireman had to shovel in the heel and maintain it
    at different times during the trip.
    LEW
     
  9. Black Cloud

    Black Cloud TrainBoard Member

    212
    0
    18
    Lew, what part of good ole' Indiana are you from?
     
  10. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    Live at Knightstown.Worked at So.
    Anderson 31 yrs. and Avon-Crestline,
    Ohio 11 yrs. LEW
     
  11. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    A little more on stokers.the Central also used the Hanna stoker of which
    there were two types,the S-f and
    the H-4.The Hanna differed from the
    Standard BK and HTin that it had
    only two jet valves,a sheet blast for fine coal and nozzles for larger coal.The delivery from the tender
    to fire door was by a screw in a
    conveyor.On the S-f there was a side
    screw on each side at the fire door
    to give an even distibution of coal
    at the distributor plate.I only know
    of one engine in our area with this
    type of stoker.It was an L-2 4-8-2
    2706 and was the fireman's friend.
    This engine had a good water pump
    and was an easy steamer. When the
    engineer had the engine running on
    almost level track and on the Mich.
    Br.it was still up and down,you could set the pump and stoker with the steam pressure about 5# under the pops and it would go 3 or 4
    miles dropping 5# of steam up grade
    and pick it up going down
    On the H-4 stoker you did not have
    the side screws.On both models you
    controlled the amount of coal to the corners gates or slides The fireman
    could adjust these gates to any amount for the condition at hand.If the fire was light in the middle you could lift both gates throwing the coal
    to the middle.If light under the
    dist. plate cut way back on the fine
    coal.The two hands on the Duplex
    gauge were black for fine coal or
    low pressure and red for larger coal
    or high pressure.Wet coal changed
    the pressure needed more on these
    stokers than the Standard.Some of the H-10's had these stokers and did
    good job.One day I was having a
    little trouble with the fire and the enginer said that he reversed the
    jet pressure when he was firing this
    stoker.Normally the red hand was
    ahead.This was because the fine coal
    the black hand would have 10# and the red hand would have 15#.I reversed the pressures and always
    had a good fire with these engines.
    I know I'm running on forever but one more thing.When we were on the
    B&O between N Vernon,In. and Jeffersonvile,In. they would run these H-10's as fast as they would
    go, and this was 68-70mph.From about
    62mph on up they would get what I
    called the pop corn shuffle.At these speeds the engine was getting out of balance and would start to suffle
    like a pop corn popper on a stove.
    When they started this you shut the
    jet pressure off and rolled the coal
    in as if you were firing under normal conditions. The shuffle would
    move the coal from the rear to the
    front of the fire box as if you were using the jets.When you arrived at
    the house your fire was about 5 in.
    deep and flat as a floor a perfect
    fire. LEW
    coal jet
     
  12. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    LEW, there's no way you could say too much about those subjects. Great information and sad that those days are gone forever. Yesterday I chased the SP 4-8-4 4449, which is an oil burner. It has 5 or more valves on the fireman's side that I guess send an atomized spray of oil into different sectors of the firebox, much like the coal stokers fed different sectors. :confused: [​IMG]
     
  13. hudsonut1

    hudsonut1 TrainBoard Member

    102
    0
    19
    Fitz
    The air horns were add ons. They weren't built with them.
    The whistle was laying down near the stack on the fireman's side (left).
    The bell was mounted under the pilot,on the right side.
     
  14. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    Hudsonutt,glad you could clear up the horn and bell.Do you have any
    idea when they applied the horn?
    Can remember hearing these engines
    whistle but with the air horn on the side of the boiler the sound could be deadened.Did they keep both
    whistle and horn? LEW
     
  15. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Thanks Ron. I assume from the whistle location that you have found the sought after photo of the top of the Niagara. :confused:
     
  16. hudsonut1

    hudsonut1 TrainBoard Member

    102
    0
    19
    "Central Headlight" First Quarter 1989,says that 5500 was the first to have the horn on 3/5/47 and that "it is probable that all"...had them within a short time after that. Any photos that I have looked at since this came up that were taken after 1947 show the horns.
     
  17. hudsonut1

    hudsonut1 TrainBoard Member

    102
    0
    19
    Fitz,yes I found some shots of the stack area. I had seen that side before but couldn't find the right side.
    Oh,one more thing,about the bell. Seems some of the Niagara's had them placed on the right side above the valve gear hanger in later years.
     
  18. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    I was forced assigned as an engineer
    to the Goshen switch run in the early
    60's.As our division was a young
    division,meaning the engineers were
    from 30-50 yrs.old,I worked with
    older by 10 yrs.mainline NYC firemen
    and they would tell about firing
    the 6000's.East bound from Elk to
    Goshen is slightly up grade and 10
    mile between.They said with any
    passenger train if you were not
    running 80 mph. through Goshen some-
    thing was wrong with the engine.
    Coming west;about 10 east of Goshen
    it started down grade slightly at
    Millersburg all the way to Elk.These
    engines steamed so easy and just
    more or less drifted the 20 miles
    that you had to watch the fire or
    it would almost be out at Elk.and
    the steam pressure would still be
    against the pops.Hudsonut1 I notice
    the word michigan in your profile
    would you be interested in a photo
    of the Niles Michigan depot LEW
     
  19. hudsonut1

    hudsonut1 TrainBoard Member

    102
    0
    19
    Sure,always looking for photos of anything Michigan, on the Central.
    There has been some discussion regarding the use / lack of 6000's on the MC.
    It has been stated that they didn't run between Chicago and Detroit because of the clearences in Detroit. There were only certain tracks in the terminal area that they could run on.
    Do you know if they ran to Jackson at all?
    I am from the Detroit area (Wayne).The only 6000's I saw were at Toledo.
    Thanks,Ron
     
  20. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    No I don't have an answer.When we were working steam we ran from Benton Harbor-Niles-South Bend and
    return.At the time of night we were
    at Niles yard it was frieght running
    time.After diesels and they shut down Niles our terminal was changed
    to Niles and when I was forced as-
    signed to Niles I don't remember any
    of the engine crews talking about
    the 6000s.The crews on the west end
    worked Niles-Chicago and return.On
    the east end Jackson-Niles-Detroit
    deadhead back to Jackson.The next
    trip they would reverse and I think
    one crew ran Jackson -Niles and return.Of course the 16 hr. law was
    still in.If the crews worked this
    schedule with steam I don't know.If
    they had restrictions I don't imagine they used the 6000 because
    of the hassle of changing power at
    Jackson except in an emergency on an
    east bound from Chicago.
    e-mail your address to my personal
    e-mail and I will send the photo
    by snail mail.The photo is about 4
    yrs. old. LEW
     

Share This Page