Oct 28, 2010
Nice video. Never have seen a return loop on T-Trak before.
National T-TRAK Layout website
So this weekend I went to the Plano, Tx show and saw lots of cool stuff (there's a post with links to pics under the inspection pit).
First off, any comments I've made that may have indicated that TTrak isn't coming along and being elevated as a serious form of modelling should be ignored and I apologize if I offended anyone. There were some great examples (see pics) of high level modelling and I really likes some of the takes on things I saw. There were two TTrak clubs there and they each had some good things to offer. I'm thinking about starting a few modules myself and getting involved with one of the local clubs.
Here's the rub I can't get over-the small modules equal more track joints, which in my observation leads to more derailments/uncoupling of trains. While there's no way around that, the only thing I can see is that when putting the layout together, great care needs to be taken to make sure everything's level and the joints are smooth. Also, the corners are really tight and that makes longer locos and cars look toy-like as they go around the layout. I'm not sure if there's been take of another spec for corners to open them up more like NTrak, but even if it was taken halfway there it would help. As it sits, there's no way to run long trains and some equipment with the tight corners without derailments.
So I'm going to say that while I'm not all in, I'm convinced TTrak is here to stay and there is pretty much unlimited potential on the horizon. I saw some use of sound/led's and other techniques this weekend that ensure that. If the corner issue is figured out, I think it'll attract others that find that distracting and will serve to advance the hobby and TTrak even further.
Does anyone know if there is any talk among those that are in charge of the TTrak specifications about changing the corners so they're more suitable to longer equipment/trains?
Your 'shorter modules-more joints-equals more derailments' is unfounded...the Kato Unitrack joint pretty much prevents this, especially, as you stated, when even casual care is taken to level the modules (with the required adjusting bolts), In fact, T-TRAK exhibits far less issues with uncoupling/derailments due to track joins than does NTRAK.
As to your 'larger radius curve/corner' issue...many, many T-TRAK clubs have also built larger radii corners and endcaps to the larger radius Kato curves (19"), including our group. These radii corners/endcaps can even be used in a racetrack oval setup opposite two smaller radii corners with a single module between them. This way, clubs that are using onlt the larger radii corners/endcaps can still be setup with clubs using the smaller corners/endcaps.
As far as popularity...
T-TRAK is growing rapidly...certainly beyond all reasonable expectations...
Witness the record-breaking layout last summer in Kansas City, and the exposure it garnered there, not just with the public, but with the NMRA convention goers, who voted T-TRAK modules as 2 out of the top 3 Model Railroad modules from the entire show! With the top prize (Best of Show) going to a T-TRAK Module...!
Check out the official National T-TRAK Layout website for more info...
small T-TRAK layout set up in the upstairs office/hobby room...
Great little video of the North Raleigh Model Railroad club's combined T-TRAK layout last November.
Have you ever used any Unitrack?
The original concept sized the modules so that an oval layout could be set up on a typical folding "banquet" table, such as those used for dealer displays at train shows. If you have more space available, nothing necessarily prevents you from creating corners with larger radius curves. Kato makes 28" radius track sections. If that is insufficient, they also offer a transition track piece that would allow you to use flex track to make whatever radius curves you might want.