"Limited" quantities

Tony Burzio Jun 6, 2007

  1. Tony Burzio

    Tony Burzio TrainBoard Supporter

    2,467
    144
    41
    Hi!

    Since most new runs of items are "limited quantities", shouldn't this be the norm? If a whole bunch of items are produced, they could call it "gusher quantities" or something! :teeth:
     
  2. AB&CRRone

    AB&CRRone TrainBoard Supporter

    1,700
    1
    28
    Seems so. I was interested in reading "Preorder or Else" on Tony's Train Exchange site: http://www.tonystrains.com/tonystips/2007/053107.htm

    I don't mind preordering, I usually do from a proven company. But only if it is something I want. All the coercion in the world won't make me preorder, or order, a product I simply don't want.

    Ben
     
  3. Pete Nolan

    Pete Nolan TrainBoard Supporter

    10,587
    237
    125
    Nice link, Ben!

    My loco roster is saturated. There are no more "must-haves." My days of snapping up four of everything--four mallets, four Mountains, an ABBA consist--are finished. What would I do with them? I'm not a collector. My philosophy has been to buy it and put it on the layout. So I'm not going to pre-order much stuff.
     
  4. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,068
    27,748
    253
    Limited quantity? Like the production run is limited to 100,000 units? Limited, to me, simply means it's not under constant production like Atlas flex track....
    I'm nearly at the same fleet description Pete is.. Unless it is a true must-have, I have passed on loads of stuff nowadays. The PSCX Thrall gons were a must-have, though!:)
     
  5. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,675
    23,174
    653
    Coerce. That's a word I would consider using. The 'buy now, or forever search' idea does not sit well at my house. A business may have every right to market in that fashion. But it instantly turns me off. And I will not pre-order vaporware.

    "Collection" saturation- Well, I do have needs. At present, they don't exist. So I just move ahead without...

    Market saturation. That's another thing altogether. Example- We have seen FT's done in brass, and by two major name plastic shelled manufacturers. The more who enter the fray, the harder their sell. Items will naturally remain on shelves. If those companies are complaining, a look inward would provide their answer...

    :sad:

    Boxcab E50
     
  6. Rossford Yard

    Rossford Yard TrainBoard Member

    1,209
    142
    34
    Here are two quotes from that Tony's article that caught my eye:

    "Prior to the last several years the locomotive manufacturers were producing substantial lots, 5,000 to 40,000 units depending on the popularity of the model and road names. They produced these volumes in anticipation of future sales, confident that they would sell out their runs. Starting about 4 years ago, as the market began to saturate, the manufacturers' stocks started accumulating and were not flying off the shelves as in the past. This of course tied up capital and affected their bottom lines."

    "Now some of the manufacturers are announcing new runs but not publishing a release date or pre-investing in the tooling. Instead they are looking at the pre-order numbers for the green light to go forward, and holding development until the volume typically around 2000 units can support it."

    Wow, I always have trouble believing how small the MRR market it - and those numbers are for HO scale. I presume N, with about half the modelers would have about half the sales, although we do tend to collect more and may be the growingest scale.

    I suspect 2-3K may still be the minimum run, and perhaps 20K the max per loco model over several runs in N. Think about that, though - If the mfg sells to wholesalers at 50% or retail - or about $45-50 per loco and only 5000 are made in the first run, then we are talking about a gross of about $250K.

    As I understand it, tooling costs about half that, if not more. I have read on various forums that once tooled, production costs just pennies, and ocean shipping costs just pennies as well per unit. But the motor, jewel cases, painting, ads, trade shows, office space, etc. all come out of what's left.

    Of course, the second runs become hugely profitable, with tooling costs not allocated to them but wow, if they break even on run one, they have to wait a year or so to make that profit on their money.

    Short version - I don't think we have any cause to say the mfgs are ripping us off with high prices. I doubt they do anything other than buy themselves model railroad related jobs. I guess the numbers look a little better in HO if double the sales volume is true. But, its not hard to see why they don't do as much rare stuff in N.
     
  7. Pete Nolan

    Pete Nolan TrainBoard Supporter

    10,587
    237
    125
    Good analysis, Jeff.

    From what I've seen, tooling costs are coming down, under relentless market pressures. Even in low-cost countries, the "last-generation" machine tools and computer technology are being employed--not the newest, to be sure, but adequate to produce model trains. Because it's coming down, the limited runs can get smaller and smaller.

    Even in low-tech manufacturing, there's a huge push for re-usuable parts and designs. I think the Life-Like series of diesels exemplifies this. Much of the mechanisms are identical, albeit stretched, shrunk or modified a bit. Computer-driven milling machines can make dies for things like body slugs pretty quickly.

    I'm not as sure about plastic shells. Injection molding dies are still expensive, especially as details get finer and finer. I presume that costs are coming down while capabilities increase.
     
  8. acsxfan1

    acsxfan1 TrainBoard Member

    345
    1
    24
    Limited runs allow manufacturers to keep their costs low, and dealers to hype the limited availability to increase their sales.

    I have never had a problem getting a model in the secondary market, or from my favorite dealer (Chuck @ FRTS).
     
  9. AB&CRRone

    AB&CRRone TrainBoard Supporter

    1,700
    1
    28
    N Scale modeling may be the best bargain in the world today as far as enjoyment derived and the last-ability of the product with ordinary care. I have never balked at the price of anything N Scale as long as it is something that fits my modeling scheme and I still enjoy products bought 40 years ago. I can't say that about many things.

    My advice to model producers who have to be assured of a market before producing the first rivet is limit the feeler to a more reasonable period. If it is not popular and the reservations do not come, drop it. Propose something else. Otherwise you create a Mexican-standoff situation of you won't build unless we come and we won't budge because you won't build anything.

    Ben
     
  10. broadway zephyr

    broadway zephyr TrainBoard Member

    223
    3
    20
    In a Mexican standoff situation, not only do we both lose, but the manufacturers are out of business. Buyers don't have to buy anything. Sellers HAVE to sell stuff. If they want to play this game, they won't play it for long. Someone else with some risk tolerance and capital will come in and produce something they THINK the market will want and fill the void. Guess what? Thats the new producer who you will now have confidence in.

    Why is it that there are some manufacturers who keep trying to play the marketplace, and then there are others who just bring new products, they do well, and they bring the next one? Thats the model that works. Think Kato, Atlas...
     
  11. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,068
    27,748
    253
    I can imagine (referring to the stellar Athearn N Challengers) that the risk involved and capital outlay is enormous, before even a single dollar of profit (months later) rolls in. The manufacturers that take a new model to market with no hooplah, short delivery time, and just drop a new model on our proverbial doorsteps a mere month or so after the model is announced circumvents the "pre-order or else" mindset (Kato, recently), and more or less goes out on a limb to bring a new model to us without any guaranteed preorders, etc. While I applaud Atlas, IM, Athearn, and others for their dedication to the scale, their longer lead times can be discouraging. The Athearn 4-6-6-4's seemed to take forever to get here, but they were worth it. Notice the quick announcement of new schemes? I'd love to have a "Greyhound" UP Challenger, but the money is just not here.
    Maybe I'm venting, but I like Kato's thumbing its nose at the preorder for months ahead of time way of thinking, and offering quality stuff without the several-month-wait! Granted, I haven't partaken, but if they announce an SD45 rerun, and/or UP Streamliner cars to go behind my UP 3985, I'm in trouble!:eek:
     
  12. TonyHammes

    TonyHammes TrainBoard Member

    1,359
    213
    34
    I think "limited" quantities is a function of the hobby, at least for serious modelers. If you go into Hobby Lobby you can pick up virtually any cheap nscale box set at any time. These are marketed to those entering the hobby or kids. I imaging that is a pretty steady market. However, if you look at the higher end stuff the market is probably limited mostly to pure hobbyist and collectors. My assumption is this market pretty much snaps up what they want or need once it is available. Collectors grab one of each and model railroaders grab what their roster needs and wallets can afford. By pre-announcing manufactures can ship what is needed and hobby shops aren't forced to carry a lot of overhead. I can't imaging there are many units manufactured (releative to other items) every run. Over time a manufacture can re-relase a scheme in another number to catch those that missed the first run or want to roster some new engines. I agree it does seem like forever for some units to get out there. The challengers and the Intermountain units seem to take a long time. I myself can generally wait since I have enought stuff on the want list and in the project box to keep me happy. Once a unit is out there I know that BN will be done within one or two runs and a manufacture like Atlas generally runs two or even three "runs" in a year. I waited about a year for BN MP15s once they were announced. Not a big deal to me. The new Kato marketing system is interesting. They must be heavily using historical data and probably running a little less so hobby shops don't have to soak up a big inventory. I myself do not like it since I generally pre-order and commit my budget months ahead. I buy a set amount every month and if Kato did GP50s in BN next month I would have to dip into the wallet for extra train money since my Intermountain SD45-2 should be out by July and soak up that money.
     
  13. sandro schaer

    sandro schaer TrainBoard Member

    2,020
    87
    43
    some additions :

    - it costs about $250k-300k before the first model leaves the molds. this is for an average 6-axle diesel
    - after that production costs are roughly $20 per loco

    assume a msrp of $80. minus production costs gives $60 to pay off for the molds. this means you must sell (not produce) 5000 locos to cover your initial costs.



    the reasons for limited runs are simple :
    the factory which produces atlas, intermountain and others is very good booked. means there are little chances to do a quick run within months. if you want to produce a loco you have to reserve/buy a production time slot more than one year in advance. currently it's 18 months lead-in time before your models will be produced.

    therefore having another 500 locos done, maybe 4 months later, to cover unexpected demand is not possible.

    this is a bit different with companies running their own manufacturing plant. but i bet even kato is not able to do quick and unplanned (in the meaning of 1-2 years in advance) reruns.
     
  14. Rossford Yard

    Rossford Yard TrainBoard Member

    1,209
    142
    34
    Sandro,

    Thanks for filling in some additional info.

    But the mfgs. don't get all of the MSRP. Most locos MSRP at $100-105 now, and the wholesaler buys it for about $50 and sells it to the shops for perhaps $60-61.

    I have heard that shipping the tooling overseas has also reduced that cost to below $200K. It would have to, if runs are about 5000 now. I presume the mfgs would like to at least break even on the first run!

    If the mfg gets $50 per loco, and $20 is actual production/shipping/ads/overhead cost, and run is 5000, then the per unit tooling cost to break even is $30 at most, so total tooling costs can't exceed $150K.

    According to that same Tony's post, BLI uses 2000 pre-orders to produce a loco, although it seems they produced about 20,000 based on those 2000 orders! (Well, maybe only 5000 or so, perhaps to fill one container?)
     
  15. Charlie Vlk

    Charlie Vlk February 5, 2023 In Memoriam

    791
    132
    29
    News Flash:
    EVERYTHING in the Hobby of Model Railroading is and always has been "Limited Run"....with the possible exception of track items.
    The only difference is that, largely thanks to N Scale and Micro-Trains,
    customers started demanding and manufacturers figured out that they could sell more if they didn't repeat the same roadnames and roadnumbers with each production.
    I can guarantee you that no manufacturer plans on making less than they can sell in a production just to make the item scarce.... it is counter to any business model I know of other than "Surefire Bankruptcy". Guessing the demand on Model Railroad Products isn't easy.... I've been constantly surprised every time something comes out one way or another (too many, too few). Kato's new model is smart...
    build a reasonable number more frequently and go back to the well for a particular item for more if demand warrants.....but with a different roadnumber so you can pick up some second time customers.
    BTW, the estimates of production quantities are a lot lower for the industry than you would think.... the market is very broad but very shallow (lots of different items divided up by many roadnames and roadnumbers) because of the growing sophistication of the customer and the competitiveness of the marketplace.
    Charlie Vlk
     
  16. Tony Burzio

    Tony Burzio TrainBoard Supporter

    2,467
    144
    41
    Why don't they ask what we want? The average model railroad is in the planning and building stage for over a decade, and the desire for cars and engines to support it is pretty constant per modeler over that time.

    If Kato had asked if we wanted a tunnel motor... :teeth:
     
  17. AB&CRRone

    AB&CRRone TrainBoard Supporter

    1,700
    1
    28

    My sentiments exactly. Where they get their ideas is very puzzling to me. And sometimes we are not amused by the choices made by the manufacturers.

    Ben
     
  18. Rossford Yard

    Rossford Yard TrainBoard Member

    1,209
    142
    34
    Charlie,

    Would there ever be a situation where techical limitation might cause a shortage. For example, if a shipping container holds 10,000 locos and they have orders for 11,000 they just don't want to pay for the second, mostly empty container to be shipped, or if a paint machine needs to be cleaned every 1000 units and they have 1200 orders, etc.?

    I assume its rare, but it happens.

    I agree that ordering systems that allow tailor made runs make sense, and if in doubt, making a bit less than you might, knowing that the second run can make up the difference. As to second time customers, new road numbers AND the ability to buy over time both probably figure in, and while I wouldn't specifically under produce to what I knew I could sell, lets face it - there is more incentive to buy a "new" run than something that has been on a dealers shelf for a while.

    Ben,

    I am sure the mfgs aren't amused by their bad choices either! They can't possibly have the resources to overcome too many bad choices. For that matter, they probably don't have the resources to do the kind of market research that a, say, Coca Cola might do for a new product launch. I think they do cheap but good research by reading the net!

    I think the mfgs are pretty smart and the limited run model, while not perfect, is the best solution for just about every one - except a modeler who wants a model that is no longer produced.
     
  19. Charlie Vlk

    Charlie Vlk February 5, 2023 In Memoriam

    791
    132
    29
    When I was at Kato I considered the Tunnel Motor... but under the "rules" in force at the time it was passed over because the anticpated market was not sufficient.
    Yes, InterMountain has done the engine and done well with it. But IM's production requirements are different than Kato's. Some mergers and resales since have expanded the possible roadnames (this was before the SP was swallowed by the UP!!) but even so, the unit is less marketable than some that Kato could do. Same for Atlas. Which is why InterMountain did it and not Kato, Atlas or LifeLike.
    I haven't done the calculations but N Scale locomotive production is limited by a lot of factors, but the size or cost of a shippiing container ain't one of them!!!
    There are plenty of customers with plenty of ideas and most of the manufacturers hear and note what they have to say.... the internet, mail, shows, and most important....sales of product!!
    BUt I'll have to disagree slightly.... sometimes a manufacturer brings out a model that I didn't know I wanted until I saw it..... manufacturers
    can follow the market, ride it, or lead it.... a good balance of all three is probably the best.
    Charlie Vlk
    Railroad Model Resources
     
  20. sd90ns

    sd90ns TrainBoard Member

    946
    995
    35
    Originally posted by Charlie Vlk

    “I can guarantee you that no manufacturer plans on making less than they can sell in a production just to make the item scarce...”

    Obviously you were not one of those left hanging by Life Like with un-filled pre-orders of Spokane Portland & Seattle Alco C-425s.
     

Share This Page