MODELING Weekend Photo Fun, February 1, 2019

r_i_straw Feb 1, 2019

  1. txronharris

    txronharris TrainBoard Member

    1,081
    475
    36
    I like this one. Definitely a cool take on the merger.
     
    gjslsffan and gcav17 like this.
  2. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,640
    23,050
    653
    Oooo. I like it!!!
     
    gjslsffan likes this.
  3. Paul Liddiard

    Paul Liddiard Staff Member

    1,371
    4,803
    63
    No flashier than this, and I like yours better.
    SPSF 2575.jpg
     
  4. CentralStatesandWesternRR

    CentralStatesandWesternRR TrainBoard Member

    21
    55
    3

    Me too, it pays more homage to both roads original schemes.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    Paul Liddiard and gjslsffan like this.
  5. fordy744

    fordy744 TrainBoard Member

    311
    304
    21
    some nice work, nice to see a step by step too.

    out of interest why are you turning the rear truck around?
     
  6. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,280
    50,219
    253
    He likes to get the prototype "see through" look at the rear grills by moving the gear tower forward. Here is one that he did about 6 years ago. I was impressed.
    [​IMG]
     
    Mike VE2TRV, fordy744 and Kurt Moose like this.
  7. RailMix

    RailMix TrainBoard Member

    1,532
    3,866
    60
    That is really, really, really nasty weathering. Also see what you mean about the see-through rear grills. I had to look twice to make sure it was not a prototype photo. All in all outstanding!
     
  8. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,280
    50,219
    253
    We used to call that the "Desert Storm" paint scheme. Going through my old slides I actually found the prototype locomotive that I photographed in Stafford, Texas in February of 1996. :)
    [​IMG]
     
    Hytec and Kurt Moose like this.
  9. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,640
    23,050
    653
    I cannot help thinking the paint preparation was deficient, or that this was a primer failure similar to what we saw on many automobiles of similar era.
     
  10. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,280
    50,219
    253
    The story that I was told was that these locomotives were painted in California with all their stringent environmental regulations like restrictions on solvent based paints. So maybe it was latex? :D
     
  11. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,640
    23,050
    653
    Probably just about as good as latex....

    Those primers would fail in a fashion which left only their pigment. When the color coat paint would peel, what you would see underneath could simply be wiped away. If you rubbed a finger in it, there came away a kind of heavy dust, which you could wash off your hands with soap and water. The color had nothing but dust to stick onto. The result was any area needed to be cleared down to bare metal, as touching up was impossible. And was often re-done with a solvent based paints, which had much better bonding ability. They have improved this greatly, several decades later.....
     
  12. fordy744

    fordy744 TrainBoard Member

    311
    304
    21
    I follow, I didn't know whether it was something unique to the SP prototype that the truck side frames or something were reversed etc

    Thank you for the clarity!
     

Share This Page