New Car ideas for MTL

Joe D'Amato Apr 1, 2007

  1. Joe D'Amato

    Joe D'Amato TrainBoard Member

    1,749
    352
    38
    Ok everyone...I'm working on 08 design and production and need some input on what types of body styles you'd like to see. Remember I need subjects that meet these requirements:

    1. Not currently produced by another MFG in the past 10 years or so...if it's seen it's better days, say like the Bachmann 40' Hycube, then it can be considered for re-make.

    2. Must have seen service on more than just your favorite short line :eek:) I need cars that served on major roads that offer lots of numbers and some color.

    3. A car I like :eek:) kidding.

    You get the idea, wierd off the wall one off's won't work, so put your thinking caps on and give a guy a hand here!!

    Thanks

    Joe
    MTL
     
  2. Tudor

    Tudor TrainBoard Member

    1,747
    19
    32
    MTL needs to put out some Pullman Heavyweights.. Pennsy or at least undecorated.

    Where can I order them, and when can I get them? :shade:
     
  3. Thirdrail

    Thirdrail In Memoriam

    1,201
    0
    25
    Ventilated boxcars!

    These:

    [​IMG]

    Known in the South as "watermelon cars", these were used by the ACL , SAL, Cof G, and others into the 1960's. They were used by many railroads until the 1940's - even the PRR had a fleet to move vegetables from the Delmarva peninsula to New York and Philadelphia markets.

    The ACL-SAL Historical Society has a great deal of information on the cars used by those two railroads. In addition to the two doors for one opening on each side, the cars had two louvered openings in the ends.

    I'd buy a bunch! :shade: :shade:
     
  4. Bob Morris

    Bob Morris TrainBoard Supporter

    748
    0
    19
    Erie (as opposed to E-L) cabooses to go with all the Kato Mikados, and first generation diesels that have been issued.
     
  5. Ryan 79

    Ryan 79 TrainBoard Member

    251
    0
    14
    89' TTX flats. Already have the tooling for that one.

    How about some spine cars?
     
  6. AVR Mark

    AVR Mark TrainBoard Member

    125
    1
    15
    I would like you to consider making a replacement plastic underframe part that has the "hydro-cushion" detail, to replace the standard non cushioned detail piece. I would also ask you to consider making 100 ton trucks with 36 inch wheels or just the 36 inch wheels themselves.

    Mark
     
  7. Tudor

    Tudor TrainBoard Member

    1,747
    19
    32
    I really like that ventilated box car. That would be my 2nd choice. MTL also needs to produce a wider array of caboose models,like the NE6, bay windows, etc.

    But my #1 is I would like to see any of the higher end rolling stock producers offer heavyweights. All we have available is the old ones from 10 plus years ago on ebay.. Even though not prototypical, I think MTL should make some shorties like the old Bachmann version of years ago.
     
  8. C. Giustra

    C. Giustra TrainBoard Member

    308
    6
    24
    Northeast style cabeese. A bunch of roadnames and desperately needed.
     
  9. Metro Red Line

    Metro Red Line TrainBoard Member

    2,495
    705
    47
    89' TTX flats. Already have the tooling for that one.

    How about some spine cars?

    :) :)
     
  10. Rasputen

    Rasputen TrainBoard Member

    565
    186
    27
    How about the rebuilt twin bay composite hoppers that had their wood sides replaced with steel after WWII ended?
     
  11. LehmanNWMS

    LehmanNWMS TrainBoard Member

    226
    0
    14
    I vote the UP Business Fleet.... With all those challengers out there im sure there would be a good market for them. I would buy the complete set!

    Second on the Heavy weights!
     
  12. DRGW4EVR

    DRGW4EVR TrainBoard Member

    115
    14
    22
    I'll bang the drum once more...89' flats.

    I would also love to see Pullman Heavyweights as well. I'm partial to the older Ski Train ones myself!!
    Chuck
     
  13. brokemoto

    brokemoto TrainBoard Member

    1,687
    760
    45
    I guess that stricture #2 precludes suggesting waggontop cabooses, boxcars or covered hoppers.

    How about a wood center-cupola caboose?



    HW passenger cars, although given MT's current twenty dollar freight cars, I wonder how many would pay thirty-to-forty dollars per passenger car.
     
  14. SecretWeapon

    SecretWeapon Passed away January 23, 2024 In Memoriam

    5,121
    3,788
    103
    Hey Joe,
    I agree with the 89' TOFC's & the H/W passenger cars. I'd like to add to the mix,
    "Comet passenger cars". 1's,-5's. :thumbs_up:
    NJT,MBTA,MARC & Amtrak(Horizons,same car,differt name), all use them. Probobly more.
     
  15. LehmanNWMS

    LehmanNWMS TrainBoard Member

    226
    0
    14
    In order to avoid the double request, but i am voting with the Comet Passenger Cars. There are quite a few railroads that due use them and would open up a large area of the hobby. Now if we can get some one to produce a few Electric loco's besides The B-Person
     
  16. Bob Morris

    Bob Morris TrainBoard Supporter

    748
    0
    19
    A +1 on heavy weight passenger cars. Lots of different road possibilities!
     
  17. Mark Smith

    Mark Smith TrainBoard Member

    306
    9
    18
    Double the suggestion on the NE5 cabooses. Life Like's are not good enough to compete with a quality M-T release, plus they aren't being made anymore as far as I can tell. I'd replace all of mine with M-T's if produced.

    Not flashy but how about a deep well flat car? Could be outfitted with a 'dish' load (large tank end) and be pretty impressive. Don't know anyone making these. The Reading had a few. Undoubtedly other roads had their versions.

    Also not flashy and pretty limited to some east coast roads were 46' USRA 70 ton straight side 13 panel gondolas. Had pivoting brake shafts and drop ends. Westerfield has done them in HO. Boring, I know, but a workhorse into the 1960's and 1970's. Some were built or rebuilt with containers, also an interesting item not yet done in N scale as far as I know.
     
  18. pdx1955

    pdx1955 TrainBoard Member

    169
    5
    22
    How about a 40' steel drop-bottom gondola? No one makes these. There were plenty of roads that used these in large quantities so these could fit into the "Runner" packs quite nicely. Another possibility would be a 3-dome tankcar - again plenty of possibilities and also no quality model exists. A third thought is an overhead ice-bunker (8-hatch) reefer.

    Peter
     
  19. skipgear

    skipgear TrainBoard Member

    2,958
    271
    48
    All good answers.

    I'll second requests for the following:

    Heavyweights (Start with revenue cars, RPO and Full Baggage)
    *I'm not sure the collector marketing scheme is quite right for this one though. Many people will want lot's or roads available and will get frustrated when they are sold out in the first few days of release.

    Steel rebuilt 2 bay hoppers.

    Ventilated Box

    I would be very happy with runner packs of B&O (small ampersand) 2 bay hoppers. Any version would be welcome, but offset has the strongest need.
     
  20. JASON

    JASON TrainBoard Supporter

    1,876
    8
    38
    Joe I think it's great you've come to the forums to ask the "hoards" for input,only positive things can come from this!

    My input would be for more '89 tofc's but with the "Verti-Pac" (easy to do resin casting) add on body style or the other type of body they designed for the cadilac's etc ....?.?

    Also what about all your typical styles of (edit) "N scale" trucks,roller bearing,betendorf etc etc but fitted with Z scale couplers?
    One more would be to re-do the old MT-1042 (cant think of the others)style of add on pilot with MT coupler for steam loco's?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 2, 2007

Share This Page