Big decisions about layouts

kevsmith Jun 10, 2022

  1. kevsmith

    kevsmith TrainBoard Member

    1,987
    4,768
    63
    So, I've got to bite the bullet and make some decisions on the various layouts I have.

    The , as yet, unstarted 'Tapton Junction' layout is booked for a show in Cheshire, March next year and I'm need the room.

    i have to make a big decision on what to do with all the current layouts sitting in the layout shed.

    Republic Steel, my steelworks layout is highly popular and gets bookings for shows all the time

    [​IMG]

    Hakuho, my Showa era japanese layout has only done its premier show before Covid struck and there is a waitinglist of show organisers who want it now we are opening uo again

    [​IMG]

    Arkaengel, will be scrapped, No way can I do a Russian layout with all the misery in Ukraine at this time

    but to make room one of the other layouts will sadly have to go. Both quite famous in their own way. Either recycled or sold

    Cuyahoga,my magnum opus. 1950s/60s era Nickel Plate Road set in Cleveland

    [​IMG]

    Or Shasta. The layout that stopped most U.K show visitors in their tracks when they saw Z scale freight trains with three locos on the front and a couple of mid train helpers on 11 foot long trains

    [​IMG]

    decisions, decisions Eh?



    If I could I would go and get a bigger house but.

    Kev
     
    ddechamp71, Kurt Moose and CNE1899 like this.
  2. JoeS

    JoeS TrainBoard Member

    3,209
    1,239
    64
    Why not rework the last two together?
    Use a divider and use best parts of cuyahoga and Shasta? Could use many of f same structures reorganized and maybe Shasta is Appalachian mountains? Just a thought.
     
    Kurt Moose and bostonjim like this.
  3. rray

    rray Staff Member

    8,304
    9,410
    133
    Get rid of the oldest. Surely each new layout was built to better standards then the previous, and the oldest has taken the most abuse by being bounced around the most?
     
    CNE1899 likes this.
  4. SJ Z-man

    SJ Z-man TrainBoard Member

    3,014
    1,024
    62
    I FEEL your pain!!! I have lugged a collection modules to 2-3 shows a year starting 2004 using my SUV. Then ii became time for a National Show and I added a Big module and some 45's to angle it up a bit, now all in a rented van for towage. With now not even 1 show a year (it will come back to 2-3 over the next years, I will be retiring half of them. I will rebuild for lighter, 'smaller' format frames but usable in the home as similar trackage used in the older modules so people will still long trans, So the 3 that will be going are actually a 3-piece combo of my 1st module and it then extended ones.

    I like the recycle 2 into 1 and you (generally) need an End (turnaround) module.

    Jeff
     
    kevsmith likes this.
  5. kevsmith

    kevsmith TrainBoard Member

    1,987
    4,768
    63
    So.
    Having an existential crisis as the 'head doctors' would say it is Shasta that bites the bullet. I can run the U.P/S.P stock on Cuyahoga without feeling too guilty but it would not work the other way round.

    Stripping off the track, the Sacramento river can become the Chesterfield Canal and a new end board can replace Shasta Springs with its superelevated two tracks into the four track end of scene 'Horns bridge' viaduct.

    Arkaengel will be scrapped and donate its turnouts to Tapton

    More soon. But in another new thread

    In the interim. If somebody of sufficient means wants to buy a killer 1960/60s Nickel Plate Road layout set in Cleveland OH. and save it for future generations I'm open to a sensible converation

    [​IMG]

    Kev
     

Share This Page