Amtrak F40?

Spooked Apr 22, 2016

  1. Spooked

    Spooked TrainBoard Member

    34
    6
    2
    I've been poking around on the internet for awhile, but haven't seen any Amtrak F40s available for Z scale. I know that AZL is working on some more modern Amtrak commuter locos and cars, but I always had a fondness for the 1980's versions. (I could always take or leave the ditch lights. ;))

    Anyone know of something I may be missing?
     
  2. markm

    markm TrainBoard Supporter

    804
    241
    21
    For Amtrak, Märklin made on F7A, MTL made an F7A and dummy F7B and a GP9, all out of production. AZL has the E8A and F59 and a P42 for release later this year (hopefully).
     
  3. ztrack

    ztrack TrainBoard Supporter Advertiser

    2,186
    792
    49
    FR out of Germany offered F40s in a number of different paint schemes. I don't currently see it on their site though.
     
    Spooked likes this.
  4. shamoo737

    shamoo737 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    4,597
    557
    72
    Welcome to Trainboard. I have couple of F40PH. They are great runners.


    [​IMG]
     
    Spooked likes this.
  5. minzemaennchen

    minzemaennchen TrainBoard Member

    1,491
    443
    33
    Freudenreich was going to produce another run, due to poor per-orders he just made a handful from left-over parts and that's it. Maybe the release of the Superliner will trigger some demand. As I remember correctly he needs at least 25 fixed orders just to think about another run. And remember FR pricing, because of small series, is more then double of an AZL plastic loco. But you get by far the best drive train of any Z scale loco.
     
    Kez and Spooked like this.
  6. Spooked

    Spooked TrainBoard Member

    34
    6
    2
    Geez. I'd buy 3 alone. I guess I'll play the waiting game.
     
  7. minzemaennchen

    minzemaennchen TrainBoard Member

    1,491
    443
    33
    I would send Harsld Freudenreich an email, he might have a waiting list already
     
    Spooked likes this.
  8. Spooked

    Spooked TrainBoard Member

    34
    6
    2
    That's certainly a good idea. It can't hurt, anyway. Thanks!
     
  9. Spooked

    Spooked TrainBoard Member

    34
    6
    2
    I thought I'd post my response from Harald here so you could all keep abreast of the news:

    Michael,

    thanks for your interest. The initial release of the F40PH has been in 2004/2005.
    I made several re-releases over the years but always small quantity batches


    due to the low customer's desire. I have the impression that American customers
    rather buy cheeper locos with poor running performance instead of pay a bit more for
    first rate quality. The last re-release has been in September 2015 with total 9 units
    only. I now plan to sell the complete loco tooling and production rights to another
    company with better business contacts to the States. There is one applicant but
    there is still no final decission.

    Best Regards,

    Harald


    Interesting, no? Thanks, everyone.
     
    shamoo737 likes this.
  10. Kurt Moose

    Kurt Moose TrainBoard Member

    9,852
    14,305
    147
    I'd buy one for sure too, especially now that AZL has Superliners coming. I grew up with F40PH's and Superliners running around!
     
    Kez and Spooked like this.
  11. Spooked

    Spooked TrainBoard Member

    34
    6
    2
    Me too - in fact the only train I've actually been on that wasn't in a theme park was Amtrak's Empire Builder in the late 80's.
     
    Kurt Moose likes this.
  12. SJ Z-man

    SJ Z-man TrainBoard Member

    3,015
    1,025
    62
    Acknowledging Harald's response at Altenbeken last weekend.
     
  13. minzemaennchen

    minzemaennchen TrainBoard Member

    1,491
    443
    33
    Now we can speculate who is going to buy the tooling and rights from Harald? Trucks are modified MTL and for sure they wouldn't mind another engines the lineup...and they have bought tooling in the past (Marsilius)
     
  14. ddechamp71

    ddechamp71 TrainBoard Member

    2,153
    653
    46
    Quoting Harald :

    "I have the impression that American customers
    rather buy cheeper locos with poor running performance instead of pay a bit more for
    first rate quality",

    I guess that's not the only reason. In my opinion Amtrak F40PH are "too specialized" units. Like Marklin GG1s for example.

    I know there are a few shortlines that caught up some spare F40PH to run freight trains (not speaking of those hauling stacks on the Panama Railway) after Amtrak phased them out.

    Maybe Harald would improve his sales figures while offering some of these.

    Dom
     
  15. minzemaennchen

    minzemaennchen TrainBoard Member

    1,491
    443
    33
    Over the years he made many other road names, not only Amtrak and an undec too. The point is there are (currently) too many offerings in the $100-250 range , there is hardly any demand for small series with the price tag attached
     
    Kez likes this.
  16. david f.

    david f. TrainBoard Supporter

    1,266
    28
    30
    Chatted with stony smith the other night, he's been asked to make F40ph shells 3-d printed. Seems he may do so soon.
     
    Kurt Moose likes this.
  17. minzemaennchen

    minzemaennchen TrainBoard Member

    1,491
    443
    33
    I was thinking of doing a metal shell, well, maybe I should do a FP45 instead....
     
  18. shamoo737

    shamoo737 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    4,597
    557
    72
  19. HoboTim

    HoboTim TrainBoard Supporter

    1,601
    457
    41
    RP has its place, but not for everything! When the strength of RP becomes that or greater than plastic injection and is smooth without sanding, then I will agree it is for everything!

    Personally I dislike RP because it is brittle and smooth sides are NOT smooth.

    I would go with scratch building then RTV molding and finally cast copies in resin for multiples!

    Just my belief!

    Tim
     
  20. Doug A.

    Doug A. TrainBoard Supporter

    3,509
    161
    59
    Tim, I don't disagree with you too much on that, but in my mind if it CAN function as a workable model, it's nice to try. I mean, even if it isn't easy, having a Shapeways version is a good option to have if other options are either to expensive or not practical.

    I think of it sort of like the old "Progressive JPEG" images that would load as a rough image, then gradually increase their resolution as the file downloaded. We don't want step one, but if we can get to step 6 or 7 of 10 then it's probably gonna be worthwhile to have until an injection or resin version comes along. And, on ocassion they're actually up in the 8 range. That's worth a sand/primer/sand/paint job for sure.

    I do agree they are fragile and not for the faint of heart. But I do think after the sanding primer and some paint they are somewhat more durable. Anyway, hopefully some folks can take Stony's efforts and have an F40PH to run for the near future. I will probably buy an NPCU just for the heck of it.
     

Share This Page