Just what gauge does that N Scale model run on?

cape.gauge Sep 19, 2013

  1. cape.gauge

    cape.gauge TrainBoard Member

    26
    0
    5
    [TABLE]
    [TR]
    [TD]
    MM/Foot
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    Ratio​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"]
    Name​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    Gauge​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    Scale​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"]
    1.87 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    8.97 mm[SUP]2[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"]
    N6.5​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    6.5 mm[SUP]4[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    6.66[SUP]6[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"]
    Ne​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    4.5 mm[SUP]7[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    3.8 mm[SUP]9[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    6.5 mm[SUP]11[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    4.5 mm[SUP]14[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    6.5 mm[SUP]16[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"]
    Nj​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    6.5 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 65"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    1:160​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 76"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 85"]
    2.85 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 66"]
    N​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    1 4 feet 8 7/10 inches / 56.692 inches / 1439.6768 mm @ 1:1

    2 4 feet 8 ½inches / 56.503 inches / 1435.1762 mm @ 1:1

    3 NMRA specification

    4 1 meter / 3 feet 4 9/10 inches / 40.944 inches / 1039.9776 mm @ 1:1

    5 Cape Gauge

    6 3 feet 6 inches / 42 inches / 1066.8 mm @ 1:1

    7 2 feet 4 inches / 28.346 inches / 719.9884 mm @ 1:1

    8 600 mm Feldbahn

    9 2 feet / 23.937 inches / 607.9998 mm @ 1:1

    10 Meter Gauge

    11 1 meter / 3 feet 4 9/10 inches / 40.944 inches / 1039.9776 mm @ 1:1

    12 NMRA specification

    13 2 Foot Gauge

    14 2 feet 4 inches / 28.346 inches / 719.9884 mm @ 1:1

    15 3 Foot Gauge

    16 1 meter / 3 feet 4 9/10 inches / 40.944 inches / 1039.9776 mm @ 1:1

    17 Australian Scale

    18 Japanese Scale

    19 Industrial Scale

    20 18 inch Gauge



    I just realized I haven't seen any references to Nb gauge, where "b" is a broad gauge: Irish, Indian, Russia, etc.
     
  2. garethashenden

    garethashenden TrainBoard Member

    155
    6
    9
    Isn't it 1.905 mm/ft?
     
  3. Westfalen

    Westfalen TrainBoard Member

    4,094
    33
    55
    What is the Australian Scale (17)? There is no 3' gauge in Australia to my knowledge, unless there was some obscure industrial railway somewhere. Our most common narrow gauge is 3'6", the so called cape gauge, to which Z gauge track is actually closer than it is to 3' gauge. I've never heard the Nc label, I've always called it Nn3 1/2.

    Nj by the way AFIK uses the Japanese N scale of 1:150 rather than 1:160 so that commercially available models can be used.
     
  4. WPZephyrFan

    WPZephyrFan TrainBoard Member

    2,454
    1,633
    59
    When I first started collecting Japanese prototype N scale models, I was a bit confused. Most Japanese trains are 1:150, the Shinkansen are 1:160 and then there's that odd H10 By Kato that's 1:140. I know the reasons for the 1:150/1:160 differences, but I still haven't figured out the 1:140.
     
  5. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,668
    23,133
    653
    I've always seen N commonly referred to as round numbered 9mm. Have never before seen it broken down in such tiny increments.
     
  6. TetsuUma

    TetsuUma TrainBoard Member

    1,247
    14
    20
    9mm gauge in TT scale (1:120 ) works out to 42.52" or almost exactly like the 3'6" gauge used in Japan. The bigger the scale (1:140 vs. 1:150), the more like the prototype but it also takes up more space in small Japanese homes. I'm guessing the 1:140 scale just didn't catch on.

    It looks to be a case of exactly true to scale (8.97mm) vs. convenience (9mm). 56.5" x 25.4mm = 1435.1mm. 1435.1/160 = 8.97mm. (My HS science teacher would be proud of me right now.) Personally, I'm not going to worry about 3/100 of a millimeter.

    Andy
    Tetsu Uma
     
  7. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,668
    23,133
    653
    Yikes. HS was a million years ago.

    So, now to confuse it all, what gauge does HOn30 use? Ha ha. :)
     
  8. Westfalen

    Westfalen TrainBoard Member

    4,094
    33
    55
    I think the odd larger than 1:150 scales used by Kato and others for their steam locos were to get the large motors in use at the time to fit rather than an attempt to start up a new scale.
     
  9. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,668
    23,133
    653
    I seem to recall reading that same thought, somewhere.
     
  10. TetsuUma

    TetsuUma TrainBoard Member

    1,247
    14
    20
    Isn't that the basis for OO scale?
     
  11. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,668
    23,133
    653
    I believe OO is something close to 16.5mm gauge or 1:76 scale. Just a hair larger than half of 1:150
     
  12. garethashenden

    garethashenden TrainBoard Member

    155
    6
    9
    So, a brief history of British scales and gauges (Often defined as mm/ft)
    O Gauge; 7mm/ft: Was the "standard" for a while, but it's rather large. This scale works out to be 1:43, not the 1:48 used in North America
    In search of a smaller scale, HO was tried. IE half of O or 3.5mm/ft. The track gauge is 16.5mm. This works fine in theory except that British trains are very small. The rail lines were all built to a small loading gauge and it's too expensive to change it. The reason this matters is that when HO was first developed in the 1920s there weren't any electric motors small enough to fit British models. Someone then came up with the idea of increasing the scale slightly but still using 16.5mm gauge track as this was now available commercially from Germany. Thus was born OO gauge. 4mm/ft on 16.5mm track.
    Unfortunately, having the track 8 scale inches too narrow is noticeable. In the 1950s a group of modelers decided to rectify the problem by re-gauging everything to 18mm. This is known as EM gauge from Eighteen Millimeters. This is much closer to true scale but still slightly under gauge. In the late '80s or early '90s another group established P4 at 18.83mm. This is the correct gauge. However, the P4 standards are based off scaled down prototypical dimensions and can be quite fiddly to get to work reliably. Both EM and P4 require hand laid track and re-gauging all rolling stock.

    For Futher confusion, OO has been sold in the past in North America with North American prototypes operating at a gauge of 19mm. I believe it is still 4mm/ft or 1:76.

    The same thing happened in N scale as well. There weren't small enough motors available so the models were enlarged to 1:148. The finescale option is 2mm/ft (1:152) with a track gauge of 9.42mm
     
  13. TetsuUma

    TetsuUma TrainBoard Member

    1,247
    14
    20
    That's what I ment about OO. They couldn't fit the motors of the time ('1920s/1930s) into the models so the changed the scale to 1:76.2 and ran it on 16.5mm track.
     
  14. ben scaro

    ben scaro TrainBoard Member

    190
    0
    24

    Australian N wobbled between 2mm (1:152) and 1:160 in the 70s before settling on 1:160. There were a couple of 2mm scale kits.

    To my mind this was a poor choice as we have some very small locos and an extra mm or so under diesel hoods would have been handy space to play with. A typical US C-C EMD loco truck at the larger scale would have scaled out better too as many modern Australian EMDs have 6'3"+6'3" rather than 6'9 1/2" + 6'9' 1/2" trucks.

    It also means Australian N is stuck between the need to use 1:148 spoked wheels from the UK for older British inspired wagons and smaller ones for modern wagons, which can look a bit odd.

    Australia had some 3' gauge, albeit minimal, and yes, mainly industrial. Some was even electrified, at a tin mine in Western Tasmania and a coal mine in Victoria.

    Ben
     
  15. ben scaro

    ben scaro TrainBoard Member

    190
    0
    24
    I do not think that was the major reason. The more difficult ones are to do with steam loco splashers over English steam loco wheels, the room needed for complicated valve gear, the fact English trains run through high platforms, and the curves train set models are expected to go around.

    Motors got smaller in time, but the other factors continued to present a problem and still do.

    The whole story can be found in postings by 'bertiedog' on

    http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/5780-specifying-scale-gauge/page-3

    Ben
     
  16. cape.gauge

    cape.gauge TrainBoard Member

    26
    0
    5
    [​IMG]Following up on my original post, here are the track sizes for N Scale for various broad gauge tracks.
    [TABLE]
    [TR]
    [TD]
    Track size
    [/TD]
    [TD]
    1:1 Gauge​
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"][/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Standard[SUP]2[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"]
    18.75 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Breitspurbahn[SUP]3[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"]
    13.38 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Brunei[SUP]4[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"]
    10.47 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Indian[SUP]5[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"]
    10.44 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Iberian[SUP]6[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"]
    10.00 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Irish[SUP]7[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"]
    9.52 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Russian[SUP]8[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 186"]
    9.50 mm​
    [/TD]
    [TD="width: 257"]
    Russian[SUP]9[/SUP]
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    1 4 feet 8 7/10 inches / 56.692 inches / 1439.6768 mm @ 1:1

    2 4 feet 8 1/2 inches.

    3 3 000 mm

    4 7 feet 0 1/4 inches.

    5 5 feet 6 inches.

    6 5 feet 5 2/3 inches.

    7 5 feet 5 2/3 inches.

    8 5 feet 0 inches.

    9 4 feet 11 5/6 inches.


    Does anybody model broad gauge in N Scale?
     

Share This Page