Standardization would be nice

Chris1274 Jan 19, 2013

  1. Chris1274

    Chris1274 TrainBoard Member

    231
    1
    7
    I'm now the lucky owner of two sets of Kato CSX bethgons. Unfortunately (but as I was expecting, since it's a known issue), the one coupled to the locomotive tends to derail on curves. The Kato couplers have too much tension/not enough give, and the lead truck gets pushed off the rails by the locomotive coupler. Replacing the Kato trucks with MT 1035s solves the issue. However, I was hoping to replace the plastic MT wheels with the nice metal wheels from the Kato trucks, but no. The Kato axles are wider than the MT axles, so they don't fit properly into the MT trucks :angry:
     
  2. ns737

    ns737 TrainBoard Supporter

    722
    135
    26
    is possible to make one car a transition car by body mounting the 1035 to one end of one car? that way you keep the truck with the metal wheels and all the other cars remain original.
     
  3. Chris1274

    Chris1274 TrainBoard Member

    231
    1
    7
    Yes, but I'm pathological when it comes to things like that. It would bug me to no end if one car had a different set of trucks from all the others.
     
  4. glakedylan

    glakedylan TrainBoard Member

    402
    4
    13
    Chris
    just wondering...what radius curve is this happening on?
    thanks!
    respectfully
    Gary L Lake Dillensnyder
     
  5. Chris1274

    Chris1274 TrainBoard Member

    231
    1
    7
    11"r UniTrack, but I've heard of others having the same issue on curves up to 19"r.
     
  6. DCESharkman

    DCESharkman TrainBoard Member

    4,424
    3,176
    87
    I have used a few other ore hoppers with truck mounted couplers in front the Kato BethGons and have had no issues on 11" radii. Add a few MY or Atlas cars between the locomotive and the Bethgons and you will have no problems.
     
  7. Point353

    Point353 TrainBoard Member

    2,891
    7,711
    71
    Can you ream out some plastic from the insides of the journals on the MT trucks so the Kato axles will fit?
     
  8. ns737

    ns737 TrainBoard Supporter

    722
    135
    26
    no i mean you keep the kato truck but remove the coupler. and mount the 1035 from the mt truck on to the body just at one end. that would be your transition car. this way all your cars will have the kato trucks.
     
  9. mavrick0

    mavrick0 TrainBoard Member

    504
    0
    22
    I just use a couple of LBF or Hubert or DI cars between the engine and the Kato cars and don't have any issue running long strings of 80 plus cars.
     
  10. Chris1274

    Chris1274 TrainBoard Member

    231
    1
    7
    Yeah, I tried that and it works fine. I just don't like how it puts a blight on the look of my unit coal train. 16 gleaming (for now) bethgons, plus one odd man out. Hmmm.
     
  11. Chris1274

    Chris1274 TrainBoard Member

    231
    1
    7
    Along those lines, I was thinking of body mounting 2003s after clipping the couplers off the Kato trucks. But I would still have to do it for all of them (because that's just how I am) and that would mean assembling 32 2003s. Yuck.

    I guess I can live with the plastic trucks, and one upside is that I wouldn't have to worry about whether the return loop on my (yet to be built) layout is big enough to fit an entire train of metal-wheeled cars.
     
  12. bigford

    bigford TrainBoard Member

    725
    2
    16
    chris
    i was a sold a 20 pack of m/t's with pizza cutter wheels! man i was PO'ed
    well needless to say i did the same thing i took my NS bethgon wheels
    and reemed a m/t truck to fit them. no more derails and it dont look to bad
     
  13. mfm_37

    mfm_37 TrainBoard Member

    611
    6
    22
    That's prototype. They come in grey, black, bare aluminum. Mix 'em up.

    [video=youtube;k6I6EPqLlwg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6I6EPqLlwg[/video]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 20, 2013
  14. Ike the BN Freak

    Ike the BN Freak TrainBoard Member

    1,368
    130
    30
    The metal wheels shouldn't cause any issues with a return loop. Also the MT 1035 truck is a 70 ton truck, not a 100 ton that should be under the car.

    As for the cars, I know in BN, there isn't much of a difference between the DI, LBF and E&C cars to Kato. So I run them all together.
     
  15. Chris1274

    Chris1274 TrainBoard Member

    231
    1
    7
  16. Inkaneer

    Inkaneer TrainBoard Member

    4,349
    1,518
    78
    Get the Atlas Accumate trucks. They have a correct 100 ton truck. The Kato wheels may even fit. I don't know if they will or not but if not there are metal wheels available that will fit. You could even swap out the Accumate coupler for an MT but with only 16 cars the Accumate should hold.

    I would like to add here that consistency goes a long way in N scale. Standardizing on one coupler, one type of wheel set, etc. adds a lot to reliable operation.
     
  17. Chris1274

    Chris1274 TrainBoard Member

    231
    1
    7
    Wow, pretty much every kind of coal hopper on that train.
     
  18. DCESharkman

    DCESharkman TrainBoard Member

    4,424
    3,176
    87

    This is only a factor with cars that have metal wheels with pickups and bus strips like the Kato Passenger cars. I have outfitted hundreds of box cars and other rolling stock with metal wheels and never had an issue. Only when a Kato passenger car stops and straddles the return loop boundary is there ever an issue.
     
  19. seanm

    seanm TrainBoard Member

    282
    0
    15
    I had the exact same issue with a batch of Atlas coal hoppers. Changing the first car to body mount solved all the issues. Hard part is they all look alike so it is hard to make sure I have the right car at the head end of the train. I need to graffiti it or something. Other than that it is impossible to tell by looking unless you turn it upside down.
     
  20. Wrath0fWotan

    Wrath0fWotan E-Mail Bounces

    165
    1
    11
    Heck yes, mix 'em up! Even back in steam days, the C&O hauled coal to Presque Isle and Toledo for N&W, Virginian and Clinchfield. A lot of people don't really understand that rolling stock interchange between railroads is the norm, not the exception. They were actually designed to facilitate easy and large scale interchange traffic. My 2 cents...:cute:
     

Share This Page