Atlas 70 ton ore cars

Beaumont Yard Jan 6, 2011

  1. Beaumont Yard

    Beaumont Yard TrainBoard Member

    306
    0
    21
    Can the artificial load be popped out of the atlas ore cars? If so, do the cars have a decent interior for running them empty?
     
  2. temp

    temp TrainBoard Member

    123
    1
    10
    That ugly plastic load can be easily removed. I haven't ever really taken notice of the look of the interior - the plastic load is only about 1/8" thick, the rest is a big metal weight to prevent the tiny car from being pulled off the rails on the first curve. The weight can be removed too - I'll see if I can take a picture and post it for you tonight.

    Note that several companies make excellent replacement loads for this model (including materials beside iron ore). My personal preference are the JWD loads, which make these inexpensive little cars look amazing for about $1 per car. If only there was a cheap and easy replacement to make the couplers much shorter - as is the space between coupled cars is beyond reason.

    http://www.jwdpremiumproducts.com/servlet/Detail?no=137

    I'm hoping Atlas reruns the CP 'pacman' paint scheme sometime in the future...
     
  3. Beaumont Yard

    Beaumont Yard TrainBoard Member

    306
    0
    21
    Thanks for the info Temp. I would love to see the photo.

    Rather than putting in other aftermarket loads, I hope to run these cars empty AND full.

    My idea is to have a tipple that will actually load the cars with loose "coal". Then, once the cars have traveled off the modeled rails, I will empty them and they will come back on to the layout empty heading back to the mine.
     
  4. temp

    temp TrainBoard Member

    123
    1
    10
    Here you go. As you can see there is an obvious square molding inside to prevent the weight from moving around.

    The 2 holes in the weight itself are for plastic prongs that keep the lighter plastic load in place. To remove the plastic load, just use a finger nail or something thin to pry it up - the prongs usually pulls the metal weight out with it.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. MRLdave

    MRLdave TrainBoard Member

    1,288
    1,284
    41
    You may need to check how old your cars are........I have some older cars and the design is different than the photos Temp posted. On mine, the weight is just a small bar that fits in the recess in the bottom of the car, and the load has 2 posts that stick down and touch the bottom of the car......and on mine, the posts WERE glued in. Several of mine came with a coal load and I wanted the "red" iron ore. The new loads I purchased from Atlas had the posts molded into the load also. I pryed the first load out using a thin exacto blade, but broke the blade on the second car. After getting the first one apart, I knew what the inside was like, and since I wasn't looking to save the coal loads, I simply drilled a hole in the middle of the other loads , stuck a screwdriver into the hole and popped them out. But if you were going to run them empty, there were 2 glue spots in the bottom of each car as well as the exposed weight.
     
  6. doofus

    doofus TrainBoard Supporter

    867
    107
    21
    An inexpensive way to create a more realistic looking load is to coat the top of the plastic load with white glue and cover it with very fine ore colored ballast or sand.
     
  7. Beaumont Yard

    Beaumont Yard TrainBoard Member

    306
    0
    21
    Temp,

    Thanks for the photos. Those CP pac-man cars are sharp! I think the inside of that car looks gooed enough to run empty, especially since I'm not trying to impress anyone but me.

    Dave, you have a good point about older cars. I wonder if after taking the weight out, if the glue spots could be carefully ground off with a dremel? Worth a try.....

    I think these ore cars will look more accurate on a 1900's layout than the bigger 2 or 3 bay hoppers. If not, I'll try the 33' twin bays.
     
  8. CMStP&P

    CMStP&P TrainBoard Supporter

    455
    113
    16
    No, these cars are accurate on all layouts that model iron ore or taconite mining operations up to today. (DM&IR comes to mind)
    The Milwaukee Road used them even to carry gravel in WA, so there is a justification for loads other than iron ore!

    If you do a search on RailcarPhotos.com on "Mechanical Desgination" type HMA you'll even find the most modern version of these cars.

    hth
    Michael
     
  9. rrjim1

    rrjim1 TrainBoard Member

    821
    12
    15
    Believe it or not Atlas made ore cars without a load, I would guess back in the 1970-1980. I have 34 with MT trucks and a TACONITE LOAD WITH SIDE EXTENSIONS from Fine N Scale.
     
  10. nd-rails

    nd-rails TrainBoard Member

    225
    34
    20
    I may be wrong but I understand those cars are max 55ton (33') and not 70T cars. Until someone posted pics I didn't know what was actually being discussed.
    If you want to darken the inside give them a wash of black, then appropriate dust color of the subject material being carried in them. This is a cheap way to show them loaded/unloaded and remove the model aspect of their appearance,
    dave
     
  11. Cajonpassfan

    Cajonpassfan TrainBoard Supporter

    1,105
    33
    25
    Dave, good catch; the early cars had CAPY at 110,000 lbs. It is posible laterdesigns with heavier trucks had their capacity increased. They are only 26' long.
    Otto
     
  12. HOexplorer

    HOexplorer TrainBoard Supporter

    2,267
    3,220
    70
    Can anyone help me with wheels that will work on Code 55? I think I have some older versions of this car. ALSO: On a couple of cars I need trucks and wheels and couplers. Any suggestions? I'm no rivet counter and could live without body mounted couplers if I had to. Thanks, Jim
     
  13. Boilerman

    Boilerman TrainBoard Supporter

    415
    48
    22
    MT trucks with couplers fit and make these cars roll way better than what Atlas put on them. I have yet to install body mount couplers on any of mine.
     
    Donstaff likes this.
  14. HOexplorer

    HOexplorer TrainBoard Supporter

    2,267
    3,220
    70
    Boilerman, Thanks. I assume you mean standart MTL Bettendorfs? Or is their a more appropriate truck for my modeling year 1931? Jim
     
  15. Boilerman

    Boilerman TrainBoard Supporter

    415
    48
    22
    Yes, That is what I used.
     
  16. HOexplorer

    HOexplorer TrainBoard Supporter

    2,267
    3,220
    70
    Boilerman, Thanks again. Off to the LHS. Jim
     
  17. engineer bill

    engineer bill TrainBoard Supporter

    304
    10
    22
    While on the subject, what better rolling wheel sets will fit the stock Atlas trucks? I have 60 cars that I have used the close cut t-shank trick for putting 5 car sets together, but would like to put in better wheels. All mine were shot ruddy brown & Im using SP decals from the Microscale set 60-194 from the MDC ore cars. Makes a cool looking gap at the seam.
     
  18. HOexplorer

    HOexplorer TrainBoard Supporter

    2,267
    3,220
    70
    Engineer Bill, I used InterMountain IRC60051 36" Wheels. Fantastic. Naturally I came up two axles/wheels short so it anyone could help me out I would apreciate it. Jim
     
  19. engineer bill

    engineer bill TrainBoard Supporter

    304
    10
    22
    THX nscaler, I hope I can score a bulk bag this weekend at the Anaheim show.
     
  20. engineer bill

    engineer bill TrainBoard Supporter

    304
    10
    22
    Found the wheels but at 55.00 per 100 wheel sets that will only take care of 25 of the 60 cars I have. Will have to think about the cost! As short as the ore cars are what would be a good weight per car for running 60 of them drawbared in 5 car sets on N-Track? NMRA standards or a little lighter/heavy? If I keep the Atlas wheels will the drag be to much?
     

Share This Page