Athearn FP45 (F45) Micro-Trains Coupler Conversion

NickPrahl Oct 9, 2008

  1. NickPrahl

    NickPrahl TrainBoard Member

    18
    0
    16
    Folks,

    Can anyone confirm that the Micro-Trains coupler conversion for the new Athearn FP45 (F45) is #1015/1016? I have found that the factory installed couplers (McHenry's) are mounted to high by about half. I have installed some Micro-Trains #2001's with spacers which I already had, but I think the # 1015/1016's would work better.

    Thanks in advance to any one who answers.

    Nick
     
  2. ATSFCLIFF

    ATSFCLIFF TrainBoard Member

    280
    35
    19
    I have yet to receive mine but nevertheless answers to this will be important.
    Cheers,
     
  3. mavrick0

    mavrick0 TrainBoard Member

    504
    0
    22
    From the pic's that steve4painting put up on the Atlas forum it looks like a 1015 is the right replacement which would go in line with the SD's they put out earlier. Also from the pics you can see all the inner workings and what looks to be the hole for the speaker.
     
  4. NickPrahl

    NickPrahl TrainBoard Member

    18
    0
    16
    Have installed #1015s today and they are the ones!
     
  5. Gordon Werner

    Gordon Werner TrainBoard Member

    498
    16
    16
    can you provide a link to the thread?
     
  6. mavrick0

    mavrick0 TrainBoard Member

    504
    0
    22
  7. davidone

    davidone TrainBoard Member

    368
    2
    13
    Why change the coupler at all? The Mchenery looks and performs well with any other brand. Seems to be a waste of time and effort. I have 3 of the ATSF FP45's and have not found any of the couplers mounted too high. I like MT couplers but i'm not going to change what works.

    Dave
     
  8. NickPrahl

    NickPrahl TrainBoard Member

    18
    0
    16
    Dave,

    Must be QC variation. The McHenry's on my FP45 were significantly out of height spec.... so much so that uncoupling from a string of Kato ATSF corrugated passenger cars was happening about 75% of the time. They did not line up with anything else as well.

    As a general comment, I have not had good experience with Accumates or Kato knuckle couplers (except their static Bethgon couplers) over the years. I have no experience with McHenry's other than this. Generally, I replace all couplers with Microtrain couplers when I get a chance.

    Nick
     
  9. barlowfaudio

    barlowfaudio TrainBoard Member

    190
    86
    20
    This is off topic but about these engines. I inserted round toothpicks as with Kato F units to remove the body. Slid right off. Remove couplers first.
     
  10. leoh

    leoh TrainBoard Member

    56
    0
    12
    My three BN F45's McHenry couplers are all too high. Very disappointing. I was anxious to use the McHenry, hoping it would be the true answer to the slinky effect. I'm going to try to put in some spacers before committing to a change to MT couplers.
     
  11. ATSFCLIFF

    ATSFCLIFF TrainBoard Member

    280
    35
    19
    I also found the McHenry couplers sitting a bit high and replaced them with MT 1015 couplers.
    Cheers,
     
  12. leoh

    leoh TrainBoard Member

    56
    0
    12
    I just installed my MT 1015's and they are high, too. I feel like a big DUH! So, what has anyone been doing to get the right height? There is barely room for the coupler, let alone any shims. Do I need to make the receiving hole bigger?
     
  13. BarstowRick

    BarstowRick TrainBoard Supporter

    9,513
    5,679
    147
    It's not as much of a problem to lower them as one might think. A shim and if need be file out the coupler pocket and you are at the right height.

    Someone was in search mode in order to find this. Nice work.
     
  14. SteamDonkey74

    SteamDonkey74 TrainBoard Supporter

    7,160
    171
    90
    I actually like the McHenrys. I need to check to see if I need a shim. If I do, I think I will just make one.
     

Share This Page