Bachmann freight cars...good deal?

french_guy Feb 14, 2021

  1. dualgauge

    dualgauge TrainBoard Member

    411
    448
    24
    If you are not worried about having to lift cars up to uncouple, try Fox Valley dummy couplers FVM51000, 51010, or 51020. Also have been sold by Red Caboose. Are a replacement for the Rapidos. These will couple to Micro-Trains by lifting over the top. 4 pack can be purchased for under $3.
     
  2. Mo-Pac

    Mo-Pac TrainBoard Member

    738
    981
    21
    As John Moore mentioned some will have screws on the bottom, to hold the trucks on. I myself kept the screws in place and just added the micro trains short shank magnetic couplers. I just didn’t screw down tight. To allow movement for the trucks.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2021
    Hardcoaler and BNSF FAN like this.
  3. acptulsa

    acptulsa TrainBoard Member

    3,343
    5,868
    75
    Uncoupler tracks won't make them uncouple, but neither will anything else but severely uneven track. They're cheap and they stay coupled more reliably.
     
    BNSF FAN likes this.
  4. french_guy

    french_guy TrainBoard Member

    628
    374
    28
    Is it a Bachmann car? Looking at the 1st picture, it seems similar to the one I have...
     
    Mo-Pac likes this.
  5. Mo-Pac

    Mo-Pac TrainBoard Member

    738
    981
    21
    Yes, it is an older model Bachman


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  6. John Moore

    John Moore TrainBoard Supporter

    13,396
    12,182
    183
    One way to add additional weight to a tank car is by using Tungsten putty. From the underneath drill a hole in the exact middle. Then form some tubes of tungsten putty that are tapers so the one end sticks out of the hole. Smooth the wider taped end so that it slightly overlaps the hole by a bit, keeps the tungsten in place. Does not take a lot but it does add some more weight.
     
  7. brokemoto

    brokemoto TrainBoard Member

    1,685
    748
    45
    You would buy the 1000, Bettendorf trucks with short extension coupler. AS others have noted, you can buy them in ten-packs. If you want to retain the B-mann trucks but change the coupler, only, 1133/1134 is almost universal for B-mann of that era. The 1134s are simply 1133s with a longer shank. If you are running these on sharp curves, you might want the longer shank.

    If you are going to work with 1133/1134, buy the MT coupler tweezers. You will be amazed at how easy it is to work with 1133/1134 when you use these tweezers.
     
    Doug Gosha and MK like this.
  8. brokemoto

    brokemoto TrainBoard Member

    1,685
    748
    45
    For four piâstres apiece, you did acceptably. If you want to change the car numbers on them, erase the whole number and add the new one. Decal manufacturers and rolling stock manufacturers never agree on lettering/numbering size.
     
  9. french_guy

    french_guy TrainBoard Member

    628
    374
    28
    I have some issues with one of those (I have 4 of them):
    4 inches box car.JPG

    With the weights installed (3 nuts), the car doen't stand pefectly vertical, but is slightly leaning on 1 side (but stays on the track)....I may have to play with the location of the nuts to see if I can fix it !
     
    Mo-Pac and BNSF FAN like this.
  10. french_guy

    french_guy TrainBoard Member

    628
    374
    28
    I've finally added weight on all of the cars I purchased + the similar ones I already have, respecting the NMRA "rule"
    Yesterday night, I put them all together and didn't notice any decoupling or derailing, but some cars were "shaking/vibrating".....didn't look nice!!!
    Could the reason be:
    -) Not enough weight?
    -) Trucks too loose?
    -) The Rapido couplers?
    -) Track (Unitrack) not glued on the base?
    -) A little bit of everything?
    I've read an old post on another forum where several people recommended to tighten 1 truck to only be able to swivel without wobbling, and leave the other one more "loose"
    Would it be the 1st thing to try?
    I noticed some cars have both trucks relatively loose, and the screws are already tightened as much as possible.....The only option would be to add a thin washer on 1 truck to make it swivel only without wobbling.....do you know where I can find such thin washers? Or any tips to do them myself?

    Thanks
     
    Mo-Pac likes this.
  11. Kenneth L. Anthony

    Kenneth L. Anthony TrainBoard Member

    2,749
    524
    52
    RR54Bach.JPG
    Bachmann mechanical reefer with a few modifications and MTL couplers
     
    umtrr-author, Mo-Pac and mtntrainman like this.
  12. french_guy

    french_guy TrainBoard Member

    628
    374
    28
    Looks nice...
     
  13. umtrr-author

    umtrr-author TrainBoard Member

    2,835
    3,394
    78
    I'm a little late to this party but I also use 1/4 x 20 nuts to weight cars. That's one of the least expensive approaches. I hadn't thought of the sticky tape though... I use Walthers Goo for fastening.
     
  14. french_guy

    french_guy TrainBoard Member

    628
    374
    28
    I know it's been 1 year......but why the short extension, and not the medium one?
    Also, does it need to be Bettendorf? Could it be roller bearing or barber roller?
     
  15. CSX Robert

    CSX Robert TrainBoard Member

    1,502
    638
    41
    Just now reading this and just want to point out that when those sold for $2.50 - $3 was quite a while ago and $3 was worth more than what it is today, so I'd say yes, $4 a car is a pretty good deal.
     
  16. JMaurer1

    JMaurer1 TrainBoard Member

    2,310
    1,729
    53
    Medium extension puts the coupler too far out to look 'right'. Roller bearing trucks came into use after WWII, but they weren't required for interchange until 1963. Since most railroads already had hundreds of friction bearing trucks, the RRs just kept using them, only applying roller bearing trucks to cars used in high speed service. If the railroads were accepting the roller bearing trucks, they wouldn't have been forced to change over to them in 1963. So if you model the '60's or later, RBs are fine. Earlier it's probably Bettendorf.
     
    Moose2013 and Doug Gosha like this.
  17. Doug Gosha

    Doug Gosha TrainBoard Member

    3,595
    7,664
    80
    Yes, with model trains, the closer you can get the cars coupled together without interference between the cars on curves, the better. Prototype cars are about 48 - 50-some inches apart, typically, which is around 8mm or so in N scale.

    Doug
     
  18. BigJake

    BigJake TrainBoard Member

    3,259
    6,172
    70
    Keep in mind that prototypical car spacing is designed for prototypical track, including prototypical minimum curve radii that dwarf our typical scale layout radii. So somewhat longer shanks (and larger spacing between cars) might actually provide more prototypical car-car clearances on on the curves of most of our layouts. Pick your poison: looks best on straight track or looks best on curves? Or more likely, looks good with some compromise in between.
     
  19. MK

    MK TrainBoard Member

    3,496
    4,794
    82
    I've never had an instance where I said "I should have used medium over the shorts" with regards to interference.
     
    Doug Gosha likes this.
  20. Doug Gosha

    Doug Gosha TrainBoard Member

    3,595
    7,664
    80
    Yup, same here.

    Doug
     
    MK likes this.

Share This Page