Iran's Railways

Roger Farnworth Mar 31, 2020

  1. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    This is the first of what I hope will be a few articles about the Railways of Iran. It focusses on the first line built between Tehran and Rey and operating from 1888 to around 1960-61.

    http://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/03/23/railways-in-iran-part-1-tehran-to-rey-1888


     
  2. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    This is the next installment covering the Railways of Iran. ......

    http://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/03/24/railways-in-iran-part-2-the-1910-to-1945


     
  3. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    After the War, Iran's railways experienced a period of relative stagnation. Significant developments did not occur until the 1950s.

    http://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/03/28/railways-in-iran-part-3-1945-to-the-1960s


     
  4. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    The rule of the Shah in the 1970s became increasingly authoritarian. The royal family appropriated a large amount of the country's income for themselves and gradually the clerics became less and less content with the ruling classes. The result, as we know, was major political change at the end of the decade.

    The railways continued to serve the country and saw some significant developments during the decade.

    I hope you find this next article interesting. ...

    http://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/03/30/railways-in-iran-part-4-1970s
     
  5. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    While undertaking the research for these articles on the railways in Iran. I was delighted to find some material in a number of European language posted on a thread about the Railways of Iran on the SJK Postvagen forum. This next post is numbered out of sequence as I have already begun work of the period from the 1980s onwards, but the material is really interesting (in my view). I have had to use Google Translate to get the first draft of the different papers referred to in the link article and then I have had to clarify or paraphrase a number of things to make the text work in English. ....

    http://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/04/03/railways-in-iran-part-6-foreign-articles-collection-a
     
  6. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
  7. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
  8. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,560
    22,734
    653
    I have never seen this much information, gathered together. (y)
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  9. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    Being locked-down has given me time to do things programmed for the future. The Easter bank holidays here have also created some space as well!
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  10. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    ddm502001 and BNSF FAN like this.
  11. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    ddm502001 likes this.
  12. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,560
    22,734
    653
    Both of the accidents shown were stated to be runaways. Has me wondering- What type of braking systems were in use? Were they all equipped with modern air brakes?
     
    ddm502001 and Roger Farnworth like this.
  13. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    I would be surprised.


    Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  14. acptulsa

    acptulsa TrainBoard Member

    3,343
    5,868
    75
    Thanks for these articles. I'm enjoying them. All the WWII activity was due to the big German battleship Tirpitz, sister of the famous Bismarck. Hitler stationed her in Norway where she was a threat to the convoys to Murmansk. In fact, the British and Americans assigned two battleships to each Murmansk convoy, one slow and one fast. If the Tirpitz appeared, the fast battleship was tasked with trying to run her down, while the other stayed with the convoy. There were only so many battleships, and several jobs for them to do. So they couldn't protect as many convoys as the USSR needed.

    Your explanation of the U.S. roadswitcher is not quite correct. They were certainly used on through freights, and they were certainly used for switching (shunting). So, you are not wrong. But the reason ALCO gave for inventing them was this: The U.S. had at that time innumerable branch lines. Many of these hosted but one train a day. Some supported one each way per day, and on others trains went this direction on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and returned that direction Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. These trains took care of every customer, and even gave passengers (if any) a slow ride with many stops. Some branch lines did not have a wye or turntable at the end, so steam locomotives had to run some miles pushing their tenders.

    The roadswitcher provided visibility both directions, and protection for the crew in case of a collision when going either directions. So, it was built for switching (shunting), but not necessarily yard switching. They were built for switching customer sidings out away from the yard, on the road, in any local freight service.

    But I wouldn't change that in the article unless you can find a more succinct way to put it than I just did. It's kind if off the topic.

    The RSD-1 was reverse-engineered by the USSR, and their version was used for many decades. I've never heard of the ALCOs being shipped to Russia, however, so they may have copied one that was in Trans-Iranian service.

    All in all, the Trans-Iranian was interesting and very historic. Thank you for being the one to finally chronicle it!
     
    ddm502001 and Roger Farnworth like this.
  15. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    Thank you for all the comments. They are very much appreciated. I trust you and your are well during this difficult and strange time. ...

    Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  16. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    ddm502001 likes this.
  17. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    This is probably my penultimate post on the railways of Iran. I want, at some stage to review what is known about the railways which served the Oil fields in the South of Iran and a final installment. This post looks at the various forms of motive power on the railways of Iran since the first line was built before the turn of the 20th Century. I cannot guarantee that this survey is completely comprehensive. .......

    http://rogerfarnworth.com/2020/06/30/railways-in-iran-part-10-motive-power

     
    ddm502001, BoxcabE50 and Hardcoaler like this.
  18. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    ddm502001 and BoxcabE50 like this.
  19. Roger Farnworth

    Roger Farnworth TrainBoard Member

    526
    369
    16
    Recently, reading old copies of BackTrack magazine, I came across an article which included memories from an Army engineer of time spent in Iran in the early 1940s and in the same issue of the magazine a short note about the involvement of the GWR in Iran.

    These seemed to be fitting items for an addendum to this series of articles. This is the link to the new post.

    https://rogerfarnworth.com/2021/09/14/railways-in-iran-an-addendum
     
  20. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,560
    22,734
    653
    Glad you shared this addition!
     

Share This Page