NOCH BADEN BADEN PREMADE LAYOUT HELP

darticus Dec 8, 2010

  1. darticus

    darticus TrainBoard Member

    118
    0
    10
    I'm interested in is the NOCH 84830 Baden Baden layout. It cost about 1000.00 dollars without track etc. I was thinking of building on my own table. Most info on it is in german, I think. I Have the track plan and wondered if it could somehow be changed into english or something I can understand. I have some track plans but they are made for german tracks and I don't understand how they are drawn. SEE track plans at bottom. Can this be done with atlas track in N scale. How could I go about this I like the plan. Ron
    VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teDT55-O30g&feature=related

    [​IMG]
    Track Plan
     

    Attached Files:

  2. mjt4771

    mjt4771 New Member

    3
    0
    7
    I have been doing something very similar redrawing their HO plans in N.

    Each plan is drawn in the downloaded PDF using the various sectional tracks available in Europe. There is a lot of standardisation between manufacturers which helps.

    What I have done is used AnyRail track planning software and redrawn using the appropriate target track library. AnyRail does support Atlas track system, but in your case it might be easier to use the Atlas version downloadable (I think) from their site. You can then attempt to redraw the plan using the planning software to see if it is feasible.
     
  3. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,291
    6,382
    106
    looking at some of the radius of the tracks, I would NOT recomend this.

    looking at the Minitrix track for this kit, you will have nothing but issues on the inner 2 loops....
    912=r1 7.66"
    922=r2 8.98"
    917=r3 12.95"
    918=r5 19.39"
    927=r4 14.28"
    928=r6 20.72"
     
  4. mjt4771

    mjt4771 New Member

    3
    0
    7
    The minimum radius and size of turnouts used by Minitrix etc is a lot smaller than Atlas equivalents. Hopefully the attached will illustrate.

    That does not mean you could not do it, just expect the finished size to be bigger. This could be an advantage as the Noch layouts often feature dual gradients (i.e. one track going down, with the other going up) in order to get sufficient height clearance so gradients can be steep. Going larger would reduce this.

    Just tried roughing this out in AnyRail based on Atlas Code 80 sectional track (with some flexi included). Unfortunately the unregistered copy of AnyRail only supports 50 pieces of track so this is as far as I can go with this software. Using the larger Atlas turnouts and radii it looks as if the final plan would work out around 1900mm x 1050mm compared with the 1700 x 1000 of the original Noch design.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 8, 2010
  5. Rasputen

    Rasputen TrainBoard Member

    565
    186
    27
    Assuming you can live with the extremely tight curves, the other issue would be the turnouts. I would try and find the dimensions of an Arnold or Minitrix turnout to see if you can place your desired Atlas/Peco/whatever parts as close together as the diagram shows. You could always substitute flex track for everything else, assuming the flex track can be bent that tightly. Definitely not a layout for 2-10-2 steamers or 85 foot passenger cars...
     
  6. Carl38

    Carl38 TrainBoard Member

    59
    0
    22
    Hi, if there's some information you'd like to have translated in english, I speak German, I can do that for you. Just tell me where to find the information. I didn't know about this layout, but the video is fun to me.

    You can pm me for my mailaddress, If you like.
     
  7. sossei

    sossei TrainBoard Member

    19
    0
    15
  8. darticus

    darticus TrainBoard Member

    118
    0
    10
    I think I'm ok for now. I'll keep it in mind. Thanks Ron
     
  9. darticus

    darticus TrainBoard Member

    118
    0
    10
    Thanks all for your comments. I just thought it was a nice plan as it has alot of trains able to run at one time(5) and at different levels in a small space. If anyone sees a small layout with this type of action let me know. Thanks Ron
     
  10. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,291
    6,382
    106
    MJT, Atlas Code 55 would give you more flexibility on track radius
     
  11. mjt4771

    mjt4771 New Member

    3
    0
    7
    Possibly. I used Code 80 as the AnyRail track library suggested it went to a smaller initial radius. In reality I would probably use flexitrack and could smooth the curves more. The purpose of the exercise, in my case, was to see how large the minimum layout size became using more generous US standards. Of course going larger still would also be a benefit.
     
  12. raysaron

    raysaron TrainBoard Supporter

    222
    35
    24
    Years ago, perhaps 20, I purchased a Kibri preformed layout. I installed Atlas track with one or two changes to the suggested track pattern. I got instant scenery on a light weight and sturdy layout. Although pricey, I think it was a good value to jump start to a layout with scenery prebuilt--my opinion.
     
  13. darticus

    darticus TrainBoard Member

    118
    0
    10
    What I like is the track plan. Only 6 feet by 3 feet N scale. I would like to draw the plan to use Atlas track. I downloaded the Atlas track planner but I don't know if I can use it right. See pic and layout in action. I think originally this is German track used. Thanks Ron
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teDT55-O30g&feature=related
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page