New Layout Ideas

loco1999 Nov 29, 2004

  1. Grey One

    Grey One TrainBoard Supporter

    8,917
    3,722
    137
    Another thought.
    If you moved spur four to spur five
    Shortened the oval by the length of the straight part of the turnout
    You could run a line off the end like the “grey line” on my plan. I expect with your skills you could achieve all of your intentions.

    [ 14. December 2004, 22:49: Message edited by: Grey Gryphin ]
     
  2. loco1999

    loco1999 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,308
    0
    25
    I have a scrap piece of wood.
    I just need to saw a couple of openings.
    Problem is it's like 20 degrees outside.

    I'm not sure what you mean with the grey line,
    is that the outer loop in your picture?

    If you meant a something other than
    an interchange track please explain.

    I was just going to replace the 28" radius easements
    with #6 turnouts on that end for expansion.

    Thanks,
    Loco1999
     
  3. N_S_L

    N_S_L TrainBoard Member

    3,040
    4
    46
    Love it... and when you add your scenicing skills, it can only be better!
     
  4. Grey One

    Grey One TrainBoard Supporter

    8,917
    3,722
    137
    My "Grey Line" is the line that starts on the far left off the curve and travels the length of the back of the layout.

    You might be able to take some thing like that and do anything from a one ended staging area to a reverse loop with a yard on the inside.

    It is easy for me to make these suggestions because I don't ave to bulit it. [​IMG]
     
  5. Powersteamguy1790

    Powersteamguy1790 Permanently dispatched

    10,785
    11
    115
    Loco1999:

    How high is the divider that you will use on the layout?


    Stay cool and run steam..... [​IMG] :cool: :cool:
     
  6. wiking

    wiking TrainBoard Supporter

    604
    1
    20
    Your two magnetic uncouplers you have in staging schould be at the other end so that you can uncouple the cars and still use the engine.
     
  7. loco1999

    loco1999 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,308
    0
    25
    Thanks Guys.

    Those are expandable track pieces.
    I ran out of short straight track. [​IMG]

    Ok, I cut it.....
    It needs some work...
    Ingnore the structures.
    Had to bend 2 spurs....

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Just trying to get an idea.
    I'll move some track around and see.
    Now I have a reach problem.
    I can always rip the board smaller.

    Loco1999
     
  8. Fluid Dynamics

    Fluid Dynamics TrainBoard Supporter

    869
    0
    20
    How about a removeable hillside?
     
  9. loco1999

    loco1999 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,308
    0
    25
    Thanks, That may be the answer.

    Or just a short ridge that hides
    the back area from track level.

    Or elevate the back
    like the old plan.

    Any other ideas?

    Loco1999
     
  10. Powersteamguy1790

    Powersteamguy1790 Permanently dispatched

    10,785
    11
    115
    Loco1999:

    Create a mountain range that runs the length where your scenic divider will be placed. Make the height of the mountains about 10 inches, which translates into three hundred + real feet high.

    That will give you the depth perception you need. A scenic divider can't give you any feeling of depth at all.

    I would also raise the mainline track in the back as well about 1 1/2 -2 inches.


    Stay cool and run steam..... [​IMG] :cool: :cool:
     
  11. atsf_arizona

    atsf_arizona TrainBoard Supporter

    1,811
    184
    39
    Looking good, Loco1999.
     
  12. Grey One

    Grey One TrainBoard Supporter

    8,917
    3,722
    137
    I'm missing something. Why raise the mainline track in back if it is not going to be seen?
     
  13. N_S_L

    N_S_L TrainBoard Member

    3,040
    4
    46
    Same question - why raise it? That would be either a 4% rise for a shorter length, or a nicer 2% for half the length. I don't think there's room to make it look right.

    Otherwise, looking good.
     
  14. Powersteamguy1790

    Powersteamguy1790 Permanently dispatched

    10,785
    11
    115
    GG:

    You could look at the layout from the opposite side as well.

    Most scenic dividers I've seen have different scenes on each side.

    That's the purpose of a scenic divider.

    I prefer not to use a divider as I think scenery can accomplish the same thing as a divider if it's properly planned out.


    Stay cool and run steam.... [​IMG] :cool: :cool:
     
  15. Grey One

    Grey One TrainBoard Supporter

    8,917
    3,722
    137
    I missunderstood. I was under the impression that the rear tracks were for staging and would not be seen under normal operating condtions.
     
  16. loco1999

    loco1999 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,308
    0
    25
    Thanks for some more ideas.

    GG, That was the plan.
    But now I am not so sure.

    I will try some other options
    without the divider and see.

    More to come....

    Loco1999
     
  17. traingeekboy

    traingeekboy TrainBoard Member

    5,677
    580
    82
    It looks good. Can you put the layout on casters so it can roll out from the wall when in use?

    Staging doesn't have to be sceniced but it would help if you could get access when doing switching

    Maybe even just have some long storage tracks on shelves on the back of the vertical panel for train storage and easy transfer between track and storage or vice versa.
     
  18. loco1999

    loco1999 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,308
    0
    25
    Thanks for some good ideas.

    Now I will have some time off.

    Some progress photos soon.

    Loco1999
     
  19. loco1999

    loco1999 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,308
    0
    25
    The simplify plan on the old layout board.

    [​IMG]

    Any suggestions?

    Loco1999
     
  20. traingeekboy

    traingeekboy TrainBoard Member

    5,677
    580
    82
    Ok here goes...

    1. The little (cont.) line on the upper right. Have it come off the main at the left corner and run all along the back edge, this way it becomes an interchange track where you store whole trains of inbound cars that need switching on your industries.

    2. the other (cont.) line on the front edge. Have it make a 90% turn and then have a short straight section so that it ends near where you have the other (cont.) line right now. Put some asphalt passenger platforms on thses curves and use the long spur to store a passenger train. This way you can add some more through traffic by running passenger trains around the layout. i noticed that you do both steam and modern on your layout. Perhaps the long passenger platfrom area can be used as a TOFC, or autorack, loading spur when not being used for passenger service. I know it isn't completely prototype, but if you fill the asphalt with trailers or cars you don't even need the laoding equipment or cars on the layout to give the impression of what gets done on that spur.

    Plan B:
    Another option is to see how much space you can get along the front edge by pushing back the back edge of the oval. Maybe you can squeeze a pair of long spurs and a engine facility along the outside front edge for a mini yard area. You might be able to get a double engine house in there. without influencing what is happening inside the oval design wise.
     

Share This Page