I can see both sides of this so the bigger question is who is putting up the $$$ to build & maintain, can it be done safely without impacting UP operations, and if their is a injury is it UP's problem or not.
Bascially, why have two bridges if one will work and get bicyclists off the streets and walking trails.
On the flip side I would fully support UP saying NO WAY! if they could get stuck with any $$$ related to this, now or in the future.
I have friends that are serious Bicyclists and trust me they can get moving at 40MPH themselves and thus having their own trail in places is a good thing to keep Bicyclists, Cars, and Walkers from having an accident between them but I'm not wanting to add Trains into the combination either.
Like I said, I can see both sides...
:thumbs_up: :thumbs_down: :thumbs_up: :thumbs_down: